Deficiency Index

Bancroft Healthcare Center

San Leandro, California · CCN 055107

20 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
70
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
39
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Aug 8, 2025

458 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.564.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.14—
Annual nurse turnover34.5%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1033.3%E1550.0%F26.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B26.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 70 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F8082×

    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F9122×

    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bancroft Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 8, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, licensed nursing staff did not provide care according to professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 had been prescribed oxycodone (narcotic) since 2024 and was in hospice (end-of-life care for a terminal illness.) When Resident 1 could no longer swallow her pills, facility staff did not have a plan in place to address withdrawal symptoms from the oxycodone.This resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unnecessary pain, agitation and distress.During a review of Resident 1's clinical document titled admission Record, the admission record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/14/2023 with multiple medical diagnoses including multiple fractures, cerebral infarction (stroke) and chronic pain syndrome. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF700Mar 1, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives, explain the risk and benefits and obtain informed consent from the resident and resident representative (RR) prior to installment of the bed side rails for 29 out of 29 residents (Resident 17, 13, 3, 8, 9, 27, 2, 20, 24, 29, 15, 30, 6, 1, 7, 14, 19, 22, 18, 23, 31, 26, 28, 21, 5, 11, 10, 16, and 25). Also, there was no side-rail assessment conducted prior to initiation of the bed side rails for Resident 30. The facility's failure to assess bed side rail use for Resident 30 placed Resident 30 at risk for entrapment and injuries. Also, these failures resulted in 29 of 29 residents and their RR's to be unaware of risks and benefits of side rails and to be able to make an informed decision. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Mar 1, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's administration failed to identify, update and implement it's outdated policy and procedure for bed side rail use. The facility failed to administer bed side rails without reviewing risks and benefits; obtaining an informed consent from residents/ resident representatives; and without using less restrictive alternatives prior to installing bed side rails to 29 of 29 residents (Resident 17, 13, 3, 8, 9, 27, 2, 20, 24, 29, 15, 30, 6, 1, 7, 14, 19, 22, 18, 23, 31, 26, 28, 21, 5, 11, 10, 16, and 25) residing at the facility. This failure placed all 29 residents residing at the facility at risk for avoidable injuries. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Oct 10, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advanced directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding the medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor), were discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties for four out of 14 sampled residents (Residents 17, 2, 22 and 24). This failure had the potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against the residents' wishes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Oct 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents' (Resident 4 and 21) rooms had comfortable and safe temperature levels. This failure had the potential to cause overheating in residents and discomfort during severe hot weather. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 5/24/24, the MDS indicated Resident 4's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 14 and indicated intact mental status. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 70 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 8, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 10, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Nov 16, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Mar 1, 2022Standard15 findings
  • Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jul 5, 2018Standard11 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jul 7, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Feb 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 21, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jun 26, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 30, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2014—1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2011—2 findings
  • Nov 19, 2010—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 21, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction