Deficiency Index

Avir at The Meadow

Dallas, Texas · CCN 455463

32 surveys since 2010, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
16
Immediate jeopardy
9
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
184
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Dallas
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 27, 2026

105 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.903.26
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.24—
Annual nurse turnover58.1%55.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$35,731 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K36.7%L—
Actual harmG24.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2453.3%E1431.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C24.4%
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6954×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avir at The Meadow, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF697Dec 1, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 received her scheduled pain medication every six hours as ordered when her supply ran out. Resident #36 received no scheduled or PRN pain medication for more than two days until surveyor inquiry causing her to experience severe pain. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF755Dec 1, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to obtain the routine scheduled pain medication for Resident #36, who was to receive it every 6 hours, for more than two days after her supply ran out. Resident #36 missed 10 doses of her scheduled pain medication causing her to experience severe pain. The medications were received after surveyor inquiry. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF760Dec 1, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #36) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services . The facility failed to administer the routine scheduled pain medication for Resident #36, who was to receive it every 6 hours, for more than two days after her supply ran out. Resident #36 missed 10 doses of her scheduled pain medication. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/30/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/1/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm because all staff had not been trained on the corrective systems. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 2, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices for one (Resident #65) of six residents reviewed for accidents and incidents. The facility failed to implement monitoring, supervision, and interventions for Resident #65, who had a known history of illegal substance abuse and was HIV positive. An Immediate Jeapordy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/01/21 at 4:10 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/02/21, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of a pattern with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for injury and/or death from drug-related harm, including overdose. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF583Dec 6, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for privacy. 1. Facility staff allowed a visitor to sign in as a volunteer, but was not an approved volunteer. Visitor recorded Resident #1, while at the faciity and posted the recording to social media. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2026Standard11 findings
  • Jan 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 15, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Dec 6, 2024Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2023Standard12 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2021Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 18, 2019Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 26, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 3, 2018Standard11 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jun 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 23, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Oct 16, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 12, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2011—2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2010—3 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction