Avir at Burkburnett
Burkburnett, Texas · CCN 675035
19 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AVIR HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Wichita
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Feb 19, 2026
263 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.30 | 3.40 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.9% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $64,646 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K13.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H26.1% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1957.6% | E412.1% | F26.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B412.1% | C13.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F9124×
Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Burkburnett, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Oct 27, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #13) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered wander guard was in place for Resident #13. 2. The facility failed to prevent Resident #13 from leaving the facility unaccompanied on 10/05/23. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 9/30/23. The noncompliance was determined to be past noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 9/30/23 at 6:37 PM and ended on 10/06/23. […]
- Actual harm, patternF580Apr 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician, or the resident's representatives regarding a change in condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility did not consult with Resident #1's Physician or Resident Representative regarding a pressure ulcer that was identified on 03/04/2024 and re-assessed on 04/07/2024. This failure could place residents who presented with pressure ulcers at risk for not receiving appropriate care and interventions. Findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed she was [AGE] years old. […]
- Actual harm, patternF686Apr 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure injuries for 1 of 7 (Residents #1) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's Physician, Resident Representative and Hospice services after identification of wound on Resident #1's right heel. The facility failed to obtain orders for wound care for Resident #1's right heel. The facility failed to perform routine wound care for Resident #1's right heel. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments for Resident #1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 19, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 kitchen as evidence by: The facility failed to ensure:A. Kitchen Aide F wore a hair restraint for his moustache and goatee/beard. B. The shelves throughout the kitchen were clean and not soiled.C. The stove and oven were clean and not soiled with working knobs and all parts working. D. The grease fryer was clean and not soiled with grease buildup.E. The vent hood was clean and free of dust.F. The food cart that drinks were being prepared on was clean and not soiled.G. The food disposal was free of food.H. The food thicker was in a sealed container. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 17, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for one of one kitchen. The facility failed to date and label food stored in the refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure a kitchen staff wore a hair net during the food temperature check. This failure could place residents at increased risk of exposure to food-borne illnesses. Findings included: During initial tour observation on 08/15/2022 at 7:10 AM revealed a zip top bag with two elongated sausage sticks that were not labeled or dated; and uncovered sandwich was lying exposed on a box without being in a bag or dated; and one sandwich used for snacks was not dated but only had a M labeled (marked in black ink) in the refrigerator… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 19, 2026Standard5 findings
- Jan 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 12, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 11, 2024Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2023Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 17, 2022Standard4 findings
- Jul 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Jun 3, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2020Standard1 finding
- Mar 7, 2019Standard3 findings
- Mar 15, 2018Standard2 findings
- Mar 23, 2017Standard2 findings
- Apr 1, 2016Standard5 findings
- Mar 25, 2015Standard3 findings
- Mar 7, 2014Standard6 findings
- Mar 13, 2013—6 findings
- Apr 4, 2012—10 findings
- Mar 16, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction