Deficiency Index

Avina of Pewaukee

Waukesha, Wisconsin · CCN 525646

33 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
179
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVINA HEALTHCARE
County
Waukesha
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Mar 18, 2026

236 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.283.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover43.3%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$95,791 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.8%K—L—
Actual harmG11.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3563.6%E1527.3%F35.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 55 of the 179 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6103×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avina of Pewaukee, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Dec 26, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse was free from sexual abuse. The facility did not ensure R2 was free from sexual abuse by another resident (R4). On 12/4/23, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-D observed R4 kissing R2 on the lips and requesting R2 to open her mouth so that he could stick his tongue in it and putting his hand on R2's groin. The facility investigation which included police involvement revealed R2 did not consent to R4's sexual behavior. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Oct 21, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to recognize a change in condition and failed to react timely and provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition. R1 became unresponsive on 10/2/2021. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H and Registered Nurse (RN)-C did not seek immediate attention to address the change in condition. RN-C did not immediately call 911, but instead called a local ambulance company approximately 45 minutes after discovering R1 in an unresponsive condition. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 1, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers, and residents with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection for 2 (R76 and R244) of 7 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with documented open areas on buttock stage 2 pressure injuries. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 14, 2021

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure that a resident (R3) received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries and also a resident with a pressure injury (R14) received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 2 of 5 sampled residents. * R3 was admitted to the facility without pressure injuries. The facility assessed R3 to have been at moderate risk of developing pressure injuries upon the resident's admittance to the facility. The facility did not develop nor implement interventions to prevent pressure injuries. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 7, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer was maintained in proper operating condition to prevent excessive ice and frost accumulation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect food storage conditions by contributing to unsafe food temperatures, thereby increasing the risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: During kitchen tours on 08/04/26 at 8:46 AM with the Dietary Assistant (DA) present, and on 08/05/26 at 2:10 PM with the Dietary Manager (DM) present, the walk-in freezer was observed to have heavy ice and frost accumulation on the interior vinyl door strips, floor areas extending to the shelving, and large ice formations on the inside of the door. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 179 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Mar 18, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Jul 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 9, 2025Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Aug 20, 2024Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 4, 2024Standard13 findings
  • Dec 26, 2023Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Dec 27, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2022Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 14, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 29, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 12, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jul 12, 2016Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Apr 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Feb 12, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 1, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2014—10 findings
  • Jun 27, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2012—4 findings
  • Sep 15, 2011—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2010—21 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction