Avantara Chicago Ridge
Chicago Ridge, Illinois · CCN 145700
48 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 136
- Surveys
- 48
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 203
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LEGACY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Cook
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 232 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Illinois.
Last survey on record
Jan 25, 2026
288 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.35 | 3.12 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.11 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 68.9% | 43.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $137,658 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G512.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2561.0% | E717.1% | F49.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avantara Chicago Ridge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 18, 2025
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions per resident's care plans and care assessment in preventing falls; and failed to follow policy related to fall investigation for two (R1 and R5) of five residents reviewed for accidents and falls. These deficiencies resulted in R1 sustaining a fall that resulted in bruising to the left side of the head and R1 being transferred to the local hospital for treatment after being found sitting on the floor with left arm hanging on the left bedrail with head slouched over to the left side. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure preventive measures are in place to prevent developing of new skin impairment and deteriorating of current pressure ulcer to resident who is at high risk. This deficiency affects one (R139) of three resident in the sample of 32 reviewed for Pressure Ulcer Prevention management. This failure resulted in R139 developing a new moisture associated skin disorder (MASD) to bilateral buttocks and deteriorating pressure ulcer on sacrum area to unstageable. Findings include: On 1/7/25 at 11:30AM, R139 lying in bed with her V13 Family member/daughter and V14 Caregiver at bedside. V13 stated that she has concern regarding poor nursing services provided to her mother. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 25, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for fall prevention by not providing toileting assistance as needed in a timely manner and by not ensuring fall risk assessments were completed quarterly and annually. This failure applied to one of three residents (R2) reviewed for falls and resulted in R2 sustaining a left foot fracture. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of Partial Paralysis following a Brain Injury, history of falling, Chronic Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder who was admitted to the facility 01/12/2023. On 05/24/2024 at 2:48 PM R2 observed with a stability shoe on her left foot. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF698May 3, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided in a manner consistent with professional standards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 being transferred to the acute care hospital on 3/17/24, treated for peritonitis, sepsis, and R1's abdominal dialysis catheter had to be removed requiring R1's mode of dialysis to change. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, anemia, elevated white blood cell count, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, pressure ulcer of sacral region, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of right ankle, right heel, and left heel, end stage renal disease, and… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684May 27, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately assess and obtain medical treatment following a fall with injury for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for falls with injuries in the sample of four. These failures resulted in (R2) lying in bed with a fractured right leg (tibia) without medical treatment for over 24 hours. Findings include: R2's Admission Record documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 4-29-23. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 136 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 25, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 18, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 18, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 23, 2024Complaint3 findings
- May 25, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 40 earlier surveys
- May 3, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2024Standard7 findings
- Oct 20, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 29, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 27, 2023Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 28, 2022Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Mar 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 23, 2020Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- May 29, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 18, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 30, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2019Standard10 findings
- Feb 8, 2018Standard4 findings
- Nov 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 10, 2017Standard6 findings
- Apr 29, 2016Standard2 findings
- Mar 16, 2016Complaint3 findings
- May 11, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Apr 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 5, 2015Standard9 findings
- Feb 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Feb 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Nov 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2014Standard6 findings
- May 24, 2013—6 findings
- Jun 8, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—2 findings
- May 27, 2011—3 findings
- Feb 17, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction