Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside
Salem, Oregon · CCN 385189
36 surveys since 2010, 19 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 233
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 19
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 88
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AVAMERE
- County
- Marion
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 45 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oregon.
Last survey on record
Jun 6, 2025
521 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.22 | 4.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.1% | 44.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3771.2% | E1121.2% | F47.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7253×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Nov 9, 2021
1. Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide supervision for swallowing safety for 5 of 22 residents (#s 20, 25, 26, 27 and 28) identified at risk for aspiration and who were to be supervised while eating. All identified residents were observed to be left unattended with meals and/or fluids during continuous observations. This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation. This placed residents at risk for aspiration and death. Findings include: The 8/2017 Dysphagia Diets and Aspiration Precautions policy statement indicated residents with observed indicators of dysphagia or required altered textures and/or thick liquids would have general aspiration precautions taken. a. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Jun 9, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was continent was not checked by CNA staff for incontinence for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for dignity. This caused Resident 1 to have increased anxiety, persistent anger and tearfulness. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A 4/26/22 Admission Nursing Database indicated Resident 1 was alert, oriented but was agitated. The resident was assessed to be continent of bowel and bladder and independent with transfers, toileting and bed mobility. The resident usually went to bed at 9:00 PM and woke up at 8:00 AM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 9, 2021
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and monitor a pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This resulted in a worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 8/27/20 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The 8/27/20 Admission Nursing Database revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with blanchable redness to her/his bilateral heels [indicating no pressure ulcers]. The 9/11/20 Facility Investigation revealed Resident 10's right heel had a blood blister or maroon area which measured 3.3 cm x 2.5 cm. The left heel had a blood blister which popped and was now a reddened area which measured 1.7 cm x 3.2 cm. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Nov 9, 2021
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received pain medications timely for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for physician orders. This in resulted Resident 7 experiencing unrelieved pain and placed residents at increased risk for pain and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 7 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The 7/26/21 BIMS indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact. The 9/22/21 Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Nov 9, 2021
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This resulted in Resident 22 being hospitalized and placed residents at risk for adverse drug reactions. Findings include: 1. Resident 22 admitted to the facility in 1/2020 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] The 9/14/21 Skin and Wound Evaluation indicated Resident 22 had a facility acquired open lesion to the lower right abdomen. The wound appeared two weeks prior, measured 1.8 cm x 0.6 cm and had no signs of infection. Treatment was in place. The 9/22/21 Progress Notes revealed the abdominal wound was raised, red, warm to touch, painful with moderate yellow drainage. […]
Read 39 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 39 of 233 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 6, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 6, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Jan 26, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
- Oct 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 7, 2023Complaint14 findings
- Dec 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Aug 4, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jun 22, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jun 9, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 18, 2022Complaint7 findings
- Nov 9, 2021Complaint19 findings · 4 harm
- Jul 31, 2020Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2019Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 30, 2019Complaint15 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 13, 2019Complaint9 findings
- Nov 13, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- May 15, 2018Complaint5 findings
- Mar 14, 2018Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 31, 2017Complaint11 findings
- Jul 28, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jun 15, 2017Complaint9 findings
- Oct 26, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 6, 2016Standard and complaint15 findings
- May 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 6, 2015Standard5 findings
- Feb 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2012Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 12, 2011—2 findings
- Aug 22, 2011—1 finding
- Jun 29, 2011—5 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 14, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 20, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction