Avamere Health Services of Rogue Valley
Medford, Oregon · CCN 385024
29 surveys since 2010, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 223
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 91
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVAMERE
- County
- Jackson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 45 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oregon.
Last survey on record
Aug 22, 2025
444 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.55 | 4.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.1% | 44.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3670.6% | E1529.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6574×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6923×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Health Services of Rogue Valley, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jan 13, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards related to COVID-19 for 1 of 2 halls reviewed for infection control. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was in the midst of a COVID-19 outbreak and staff were observed to mishandle and wear inappropriate PPE when entering an isolation room for a COVID-19 exposure placing residents at risk to contract COVID-19, a life-threatening illness. Findings include: On 1/3/22 after entering the facility, the survey team was notified of a new COVID-19 outbreak. Based on infection control standards and current guidance related to a COVID-19 outbreak, facility staff were to wear N95 masks and eye protection. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806Jan 13, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent residents from being served food to which they were allergic for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#41) reviewed for food. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation. Resident 41 was served two consecutive meals which contained foods to which the resident was allergic. The response to consuming these foods could cause anaphylactic shock (life threatening allergic reaction) which could lead to death. Findings include: Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including diabetes and food allergies. Resident 41's 6/1/21 Nutrition CAA indicated the resident was at high risk for nutritional problems due to multiple food allergies. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 23, 2022
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for falls. Resident 4 sustained a fracture to the left arm. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 11/2021 with diagnoses including [CONDITION(S)] ([CONDITION(S)]), dementia and fatigue. A 11/24/21 care plan indicated Resident 4 was at risk for falls and was on a toileting schedule to assist her/him with self-transferring to the toilet and to place a bedside commode next to the bed at night for safety related to self-transferring. A 11/28/21 Admission MDS indicated Resident 4 required limited one-person assistance with transfers and supervision with toilet use. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF835Nov 23, 2022
Based on the lack of effective systems for ensuring adequate staffing levels and an adequate call light system, the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure all residents attained or maintained their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. These failures placed residents at risk for delayed care. Findings include: 1. Deficient practice was identified regarding the facility's failure to ensure adequate RN and CNA staffing. In an interview on 11/22/22 at 11:03 AM Staff 1 (Assistant Administrator), Staff 2 (DNS), Staff 10 (Administrator) and Staff 81 (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated the facility followed the State minimum required staffing ratios for CNAs and the facility staffed to the acuity of the residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Nov 23, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical and psychosocial well-being for 9 of 9 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 8, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19 and 20) and 2 of 3 wings (Wing 1 and Wing 2) reviewed for call light wait times and incontinent care. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A 5/1/18 care plan indicated Resident 1 was incontinent of bowel and had mixed incontinence of bladder. Resident 1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with limited mobility and required assistance of one person for toilet use, or a bed pan. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 223 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 22, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
- Apr 19, 2024Standard and complaint22 findings
- Aug 1, 2023Complaint6 findings
- Feb 24, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings
- Nov 23, 2022Complaint16 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 13, 2022Standard10 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 29, 2021Complaint9 findings
- Jun 9, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Nov 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 4, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jun 20, 2019Complaint25 findings · 6 harm
- Dec 5, 2018Standard and complaint21 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 10, 2018Complaint2 findings
- May 24, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Aug 11, 2017Standard and complaint32 findings
- Jul 10, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 6, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jul 15, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 16, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 12, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
- Apr 24, 2014Standard4 findings
- Feb 12, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Dec 7, 2012—5 findings
- Jun 14, 2012—2 findings
- Mar 9, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 7, 2011—5 findings
- Jul 7, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 20, 2010—3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 29, 2010—10 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction