Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City
Oregon City, Oregon · CCN 385125
24 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 179
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 111
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AVAMERE
- County
- Clackamas
- Medicare-certified since
- 1975
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Oregon.
Last survey on record
Aug 29, 2025
437 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.26 | 4.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.6% | 47.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $85,768 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G34.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4167.2% | E1118.0% | F69.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6852×
Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 8, 2021
a. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide supervision for swallowing safety for 1 of 5 residents (# 2) identified at risk for aspiration and who was to be supervised while eating. Resident 2 was observed to be left unattended with her/his meal tray two times during continuous observations. Resident 2 was able to independently feed her/himself. This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation. This placed Resident 2 at risk for aspiration and death. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 2's 1/18/21 physician order [REDACTED]. The 1/26/21 physician note indicated Resident 2 was severely demented and was unable to perform ADLs due to dementia. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 29, 2025
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent a fall with injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for falls. As a result, Resident 8 sustained a fractured arm. Findings include:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025, with diagnoses including neck fracture.Resident 8's 5/27/25 Care Plan revealed the resident had limited mobility due to her/his neck fracture and required a two-person transfer assist for toileting. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 13, 2024
Based on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care to prevent pressure ulcers, and accurately assess and provide timely treatment and repositioning to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 2 and 46) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 2 developed a preventable Stage 3 pressure ulcer. Findings include: CMS Appendix PP defined a Stage 3 pressure ulcer as: Full-thickness skin loss. Full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 13, 2023
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for abuse. This resulted in Resident 25 experiencing increased agitation post event. This placed residents at risk for physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. The 11/30/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 25 was rarely/never understood and staff interviews indicated the resident experienced memory deficits. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF610Jan 13, 2023
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed related to an allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#25) reviewed for abuse. This resulted in Resident 25 experiencing increased agitation post event and placed residents at risk for continued abuse. Findings include: Resident 25 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. The 11/30/22 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 25 was rarely/never understood and staff interviews indicated the resident experienced memory deficits. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 179 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 29, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 6, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jan 17, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Feb 13, 2024Standard and complaint31 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2023Standard and complaint21 findings · 3 harm
- Jan 11, 2022Standard9 findings
- Aug 16, 2021Complaint3 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Feb 8, 2021Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 2, 2019Complaint21 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 20, 2019Complaint5 findings
- Dec 14, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jul 16, 2018Complaint6 findings
- Jan 31, 2018Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 14, 2017Standard14 findings
- Jan 4, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 29, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Aug 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 1, 2015Standard9 findings
- May 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jan 26, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 21, 2014—3 findings
- Dec 13, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction