Deficiency Index

Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center

Baltimore, Maryland · CCN 215330

28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
171
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
225
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE
County
Baltimore City
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

May 4, 2026

189 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.993.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.82—
Annual nurse turnover21.8%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3269.6%E1123.9%F24.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 171 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 21, 2023

    Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #362) from physical abuse from a facility staff member on 5/15/22. This was evident for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #362) reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. Resident #362 sustained a fall during a physically abusive incident and suffered a fractured hip. Thereafter, Resident #362 never regained his/her ability to walk independently. This failure to protect residents from physical abuse by facility staff members resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF684Mar 21, 2023

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by 1.) failure to follow physician orders for 1 of 8 (Resident #155) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 2 of 10 (Resident #40 and #19) residents reviewed for physician orders; 2.) failure of the GNA to notify the nurse after a resident had a fall for 1 of 5 (Resident # 609) residents reviewed for falls; 3.) failure of the facility to ensure that a resident received treatment for a possible wound infection for Resident #359, and 4.) failure to administer a pain medication for Resident #87 as ordered by the physician. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 21, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food and beverages using proper sanitary practices. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: An initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted on [DATE] at 08:15 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) #27 present. After surveyors sanitized hands and donned hairnets. Dietary Aid (DA) #34 entered the kitchen, passed surveyors and DM #27, opened, and entered a storage refrigerator without sanitizing their hands. The DM #27 was alerted to the observation and asked what was the expectation of staff entering into the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Nov 24, 2025

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of quality of care based on established clinical practices, physician orders, or facility policies regarding enteral feeding and medication administration. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #9, #210, #208 and #117) out of 4 residents reviewed for professional standards of quality care during the survey. Findings include:Professional standards of quality relate to the requirement that services provided in a long-term care facility must heavily involve proper medication administration practices. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Nov 24, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews with staff and residents' families, and review of Complaints, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public; 2.) provide enough clean linen to all residents; and 3.) ensure repairs were made to a resident door and the hallways hand railings. This was evident for 5 (333137, 333135, 333139, 333141 and 333113) out of 5 complaint intakes; 2 (residents #11 and #140) out of 2 residents; and the hallway railing on the third-floor dementia unit observed for sanitary conditions during the survey. The findings include:1. On 11/20/2025 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor reviewed complaint #333113 which alleged that the facility did not have enough linen for all residents. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 171 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 24, 2025Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Oct 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2023Standard and complaint20 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 26, 2022Complaint7 findings
  • May 25, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 31, 2020Infection control4 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Feb 20, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 10, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • May 15, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 9, 2019Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Nov 29, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 27, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 6, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Oct 22, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Sep 26, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Sep 10, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 29, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2013—6 findings
  • Oct 23, 2012Standard11 findings
  • Oct 22, 2012Complaint11 findings
  • Jul 21, 2011—10 findings
  • Feb 3, 2011—3 findings
  • Apr 19, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction