Deficiency Index

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oak Manor

Burtonsville, Maryland · CCN 215315

32 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
160
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
145
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Jul 23, 2026

109 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.633.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.64—
Annual nurse turnover38.7%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$11,381 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.4%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3380.5%E614.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.4%
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 160 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oak Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 1, 2025

    Based on administrative and medical record review, observations and interviews with facility staff and family it was determined that the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident who is at risk for wandering from exiting the facility unsupervised. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed during the facility's complaint survey. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 1, 2021

    Based on surveyor review of clinical records, the review of administrative records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate pain management and timely treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during the complaint survey (Resident #1). The facility's failure to report a fracture to the attending physician and administer medication according to the physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This finding of actual harm was identified during the investigation of complaints MD 661, MD 741, and facility reported incident MD 666. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF569Apr 7, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify residents receiving Medicaid benefits to spend down when their personal account reached within $200 of the SSI resource limit. It was evident for 8 residents (Resident #12, Resident #48, Resident #54, Resident #57, Resident #62, Resident #104, Resident #108, Resident #129) out of 73 residents reviewed for personal funds. The findings include: On 4/6/26 at 11 AM, a review of the facility's [fund management company] report dated 4/3/26 revealed 8 residents with personal accounts that exceed $2500, which is the SSI resource limit. Per this report:1). Resident #12 had $2625.53 in his/her personal fund account.2). Resident #48 had $3235.99 in his/her personal fund account.3). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Apr 7, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to code the residents' status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 4 ( Resident #2, Resident #31 Resident #98 and Resident #129) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated comprehensive, standardized clinical assessment tool of all residents in nursing home. Staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care that they need. 1.) On 03/30/2026 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF887Apr 7, 2026

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to educate and provide COVID-19 immunizations to the residents. This was evident for 5 (Resident #28, #57, #48, #39, #12) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 04/06/2026 at 2:20 PM, the surveyor requested the facility to provide COVID-19 policy and proof that Resident #28, #57, #48, #39 and #12 had been educated and offered COVID 19 vaccine in 2025. On 04/06/2026 at 2:30 PM, a review of records was conducted. Review of residents' electronic records indicated that Resident #28, #12, #48 and #57 had received COVID-19 immunizations on 11/11/2024. Resident #39 was last offered COVID-19 immunization in 2023. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 160 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 29, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 7, 2026Standard14 findings
  • Jul 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 19, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Nov 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 20, 2020Standard10 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Oct 8, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 22, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Jan 22, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Jan 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2017Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Oct 3, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 7, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 25, 2013—3 findings
  • Aug 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2013—8 findings
  • May 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2012—17 findings
  • Sep 15, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2011—12 findings
  • Dec 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction