Autumn Care of Waynesville
Waynesville, North Carolina · CCN 345110
12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Haywood · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jun 4, 2026
158 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.43 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 69.8% | 51.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $107,387 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.2% | K26.5% | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2167.7% | E39.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.2% | C13.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Care of Waynesville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF684May 9, 2024
Based on observations, record review and Resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Medical Director (MD) interviews nursing staff failed to identify the seriousness of a change in condition for a resident with a diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes and provide thorough ongoing monitoring and comprehensive assessments. On [DATE] at 2:30 PM Nurse #2 reported to Nurse #1 Resident #280 was sleepy all day. Nurse #1 did not assess Resident #280 until 5:00 PM and observed the resident was only responsive to painful stimuli and obtained a set of vital signs but did not check her blood sugar. The on-call provider was contacted, and Nurse #1 was instructed to transfer Resident #280 to the emergency room . […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF726May 9, 2024
Based on record review, facility staff and Medical Director (MD) interviews, the facility failed to ensure that facility staff (Nurse #1 and Paramedic #1) had completed Skills Competency's and required floor/unit orientation days with a preceptor prior to taking a resident assignment independently. On [DATE] at 2:30 pm, Nurse #2 informed Nurse #1 that Resident #280 had been excessively sleepy during her shift. Nurse #1 failed to assess Resident #280 until 5:00 pm, at which time Resident #280 was only responsive to painful stimuli. Nurse #1 was instructed at 6:30 pm to transfer Resident #280 to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600May 9, 2024
Based on record reviews, staff, and Medical Director (MD) interviews the facility failed to protect a Resident's right to be free from neglect when Resident # 280 experienced a medical emergency and emergency medical services (EMS) were not provided. The resident was only responsive to painful stimuli on [DATE] around 5:00 PM and 911 was not initiated until 8:10 PM. Resident #280 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance) due to urinary tract infection (UTI) and possibly due to cellulitis/infected lower extremity wounds or hypoglycemia. On [DATE] Resident #280 was discharged to hospice care for comfort care. On [DATE] Resident #280 expired. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 9, 2024
Based on record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a pressure injury for a resident wearing a hinged knee brace. Resident #280 sustained an open pressure injury that became infected, had developed dead tissue, and wound treatments had not been completed. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #280) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings included: Review of the Orthopedic Progress note dated 1/5/2024 (prior to admission to the facility) revealed Resident #280 was treated nonoperatively for a right proximal tibia (bone in the lower leg) fracture and required a hinged knee brace locked in extension (leg straight) for her right leg. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 9, 2024
Based on record reviews, family member, staff, resident, and lift company representative interviews the facility failed to prevent injury when transferring a resident (Resident #280) from a wheelchair to the bed causing a laceration to the resident's left lower leg which required a transfer to the emergency department and treatment of the laceration with sutures. The facility failed to provide a safe transfer when they did not use a mechanical sit-to-stand lift in accordance with manufacturer instructions to transfer a resident (Resident #60). This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #280 and Resident #60) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The findings included: 1. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 4, 2026Standard6 findings
- Sep 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 22, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2024Standard and complaint18 findings · 5 harm
- Mar 11, 2021Standard1 finding
- Feb 1, 2019Standard3 findings
- Mar 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Sep 16, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 7, 2014Standard2 findings
- Apr 27, 2012—3 findings
- Feb 24, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Louisburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg3 harm findings
- Sunnybrook Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh5 harm findings
- Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterClayton3 harm findings
- Mill Creek Center for Nursing and RehabilitationWinston-Salem3 harm findings
- Autumn Care of SaludaSaluda6 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction