Deficiency Index

Aurora Manor Special Care Cent

Aurora, Ohio · CCN 365844

26 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
60
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Portage
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Apr 9, 2026

214 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.573.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.93—
Annual nurse turnover66.7%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$23,520 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.0%K—L—
Actual harmG14.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2080.0%E312.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 60 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aurora Manor Special Care Cent, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 9, 2026

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on observation of video footage, closed medical record review, Self-Reported Incident review, review of witness statements, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident #70's right to be free from physical abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #80. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 03/02/26 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #80 was observed via facility video footage physically assaulting Resident #70, a resident who was alert and oriented and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). On 03/02/26 at approximately 11:35 P.M. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 23, 2024

    Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65, who had a history of substance use disorder was assessed for these risks and had comprehensive and individualized care planned interventions initiated and implemented to ensure the resident's safety to prevent drug overdose. Actual harm occurred on [DATE] when Resident #65 was found unresponsive in the facility due to a drug overdose. The resident subsequently passed away. This affected one (#65) of one resident reviewed for death. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Result (PASRR) Notice form dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not require level two services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Jan 28, 2022

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affected all 52 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of Resident #10's and Resident #16's room on 01/28/22 at 7:58 A.M. with State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #201 revealed a large amount of fecal matter on the toilet seat and bottom portion of the toilet bowel. STNA #201 confirmed the observation and stated the facility did not have housekeeping staff and it had been a few weeks since the facility was cleaned. Observation after exiting Resident #10's and #16's room on the 200 hall revealed the hallway floors were dirty and had various debris on them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observations, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and sanitary for Resident #36, #1, #34, #59 and #50. This affected five residents (#36, #1, #34, #59 and #50) out of eight residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 65. Finding Include: Observation on 11/20/24 at 11:41 A.M. of Resident #36's room revealed a black grimy buildup on the floor showing wheelchair tracks all over the floor, and tables and tops of furniture were dusty. Resident #36 stated they don't clean his room every day and he would like the room cleaned. Observation on 11/20/24 at 11:54 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF580May 13, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of residents not receiving medications as physician ordered. This affected five (Residents #1, #3, #8, #24, and #55) of 13 residents receiving insulin in the facility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admitted d 04/25/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and end stage renal failure. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for May 2024 revealed on 05/05/24 at 9:30 P.M., Resident #1 did not have his blood sugar check and did not receive any insulin as physician ordered. At the bottom of the MAR under reasons not administered on 05/05/24 at 9:30 P.M. stated drug/item unavailable. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 60 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 26, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2024Complaint7 findings
  • Aug 28, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • May 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 23, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Apr 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Nov 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard2 findings
  • May 13, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Apr 9, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 9, 2014—1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2011—2 findings
  • Apr 15, 2010—5 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction