Auburn Manor
Chaska, Minnesota · CCN 245604
20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 61
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Carver
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.82 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.11 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 41.8% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1965.5% | E26.9% | F620.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.4% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7002×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F5721×
Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
- F5761×
Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Auburn Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Apr 2, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) physician orders were followed for parameters set by the physician. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who became unresponsive and required emergency transport and hospitalization after receiving insulin that should have been held. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, dementia, and mild cognitive impairment. R1's care plan, dated 9/13/24, directed administer insulin as ordered, monitor for side effects/effectiveness of medication and update provider as needed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 17, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess interventions to provide safe mechanical lift transfers resulting in fracture of distal radius and failed to follow the revised care plan to prevent impaired healing and further injury for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R1's care plan dated 1/26/23 indicated R1 required the assistance of one staff member with transfers, gait belt and railings. Mechanical standing lift with assistance of one staff member as needed (PRN). The care plan did not indicate any interventions for staff to monitor R1's left arm, R1's week side following CVA), with the use of the EZ-stand R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF576Apr 30, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays for 4 of 4 residents (R33, R34, R14, R24) who voiced concerns with mail delivery during Resident Council. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.On 4/30/26 at 9:33 a.m., a Resident Council meeting was held with four residents from varied areas of the facility. R24 stated mail was not delivered to residents on Saturdays. This was confirmed by R33, R34 and R14. R24 indicated mail delivered by the post office on Saturdays would be left on the receptionist's desk near the front entrance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 30, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store and label food properly, dispose of undated and expired food items to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all the residents who were provided meals from the kitchen. Findings include:During initial tour and interview of kitchen on 4/27/26 at 1:03 p.m., with Dietary Director (DD) the following was observed inside the walk-in cooler: an opened box of undated chicken stock an opened box of undated turkey stock an approximately 4x4x8 inch metal dish containing sliced carrots lacked an open or use by date,an approximately 4x4x8 inch metal dish with contents identified by DD as pizza sauce lacked an open or used by date.DD stated he was unsure of what the food storage policy… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Feb 6, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and leadership to meet assessed resident needs and facility processes for 2 of 2 residents (R5, R37) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, for R7, R42 reviewed for activities of daily living who were dependent on staff for their care, for R1 who was left exposed and nude on the toilet, and R18 who utilized an indwelling catheter reviewed for dignity. In addition, the facility failed to reassess and implement proactive interventions to reduce the risk of falls and injuries for R26 and R44 who sustained falls at the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to address ongoing staffing and long call light concerns identified during resident council meeting minutes. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 61 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 30, 2026Standard7 findings
- Apr 2, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 6, 2025Standard14 findings
- May 31, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- May 17, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 30, 2023Standard4 findings
- Mar 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Feb 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 13, 2020Standard1 finding
- Dec 5, 2018Standard2 findings
- Feb 23, 2017Standard2 findings
- Apr 7, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jul 16, 2015Standard4 findings
- Mar 10, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 7, 2014Standard4 findings
- Jul 25, 2013—2 findings
- Jun 29, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction