Aspire Senior Living New Florence
New Florence, Missouri · CCN 265625
19 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 87
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Montgomery · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Nov 17, 2025
357 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.84 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 87.7% | 60.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $28,486 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G38.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D617.1% | E1440.0% | F38.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C925.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7002×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F7322×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living New Florence, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF658Oct 29, 2024
See event ID PY0C12. Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to document wound treatments for one resident (Resident #1), whose wound became infected, out of three sampled residents and failed to perform neurological assessments for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents after a fall. The facility census was 51.
- Actual harm, isolatedF658Sep 6, 2024
Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to document wound treatments for one resident (Resident #1), whose wound became infected, out of three sampled residents and failed to perform neurological assessments for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents after a fall. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Orders, dated 02/2022, showed staff are directed to follow physician's orders. Physician's orders will be entered into the electronic medical record (EMR) as soon as practicable once received from the physician. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF658Sep 6, 2024
Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice when staff failed to document wound treatments for one resident (Resident #1), whose wound became infected, out of three sampled residents and failed to perform neurological assessments for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents after a fall. The facility census was 51. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Orders, dated 02/2022, showed staff are directed to follow physician's orders. Physician's orders will be entered into the electronic medical record (EMR) as soon as practicable once received from the physician. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Mar 20, 2024
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1) family and physician in a timely manner when staff identified the residents second and third toes on his/her right foot swollen, red, white, macerated, draining serosanguinous fluid (contains or relates to both blood and the liquid part of blood (serum) which resulted in the resident being sent to the hospital and his/her second right toe amputated. The facility census was 50. 1. Review of the facility policy change of condition, revised February 2019, showed staff are directed to observe, record, and report any condition change to the attending physician to ensure proper treatment will be implemented. Review showed staff are directed to notify the resident's responsible party. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Nov 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor and track antibiotic use within the facility. The facility census was 50.1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, undated, showed the purpose is to develop and implement protocols to optimize the treatment of infections by ensuring the residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic. Reduced the risk of adverse events, including the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 17, 2025Standard10 findings
- Jul 14, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Oct 29, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 6, 2024Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 20, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2022Standard14 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Aug 21, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Standard7 findings
- Aug 4, 2017Standard6 findings
- Sep 1, 2016Standard1 finding
- Aug 26, 2015Standard3 findings
- Dec 3, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 9, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 6, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 27, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 7, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 20, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction