Deficiency Index

Aspire Senior Living Jonesburg

Jonesburg, Missouri · CCN 265333

30 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
81
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
County
Montgomery · rural
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

May 12, 2026

181 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day1.793.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%60.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1639.0%E1843.9%F24.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.4%C37.3%
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living Jonesburg, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 12, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to safely transfer one resident (Resident #3) when staff failed to utilize two staff members while using a mechanical lift, the mechanical lift tipped over, which resulted in left femoral fractures, right femur fractures, a bruise to the forehead, and a T12 compression fracture (occurs when the 12th thoracic vertebra) required hospitalization. Facility staff failed to utilize two staff for bed mobility for one dependent resident (Resident #1) which resulted in a femur fracture. Facility staff failed to utilize two staff in a manner to assure resident safety for one resident (Resident #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 63.1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Aug 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to use standardized recipes to prepare foods for service to all residents and serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus. Facility staff failed to provide menus with the food items and portion sizes to be served for all diet types utilized by the facility and failed to record substitutions made to the menus. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Service to Residents, dated 01/30/24, showed food will be prepared and served in a manner that meets the individual needs of the resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use and ensure the use of food in a first-in, first-out manner. Facility staff failed to ensure dishes were clean and air dried prior to stacking in storage to prevent the growth of foodborne pathogens. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff also failed to maintain kitchen surfaces and equipment clean and in good repair to prevent potential contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 59. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Mar 1, 2022

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have adequate nursing staff available to meet the needs of the residents as determined by their facility assessment, facility odors, and extended call light wait times. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 6/21/21, showed the following: -Staff Required to Care for their facility census: -Days- One Licensed Nurse per 10 residents; -Evenings- One Licensed Nurse per 15 residents; -Nights- One Licensed Nurse per 20 residents; -Based on resident population and their needs for care and support, our general approach to staffing is to ensure that we have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time; -Staff are… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 1, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review,the facility staff failed to serve food items to residents in accordance with the nutritionally calculated recipes to residents who received small and bite-sized (SB), minced and moist (MM), and pureed diets when the facility staff made substitutions to the menus for convenience of staff. Facility staff failed to serve portion sizes in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus to all residents. Facility staff also failed to maintain a record of substitutions made to the menus. The facility census was 53. 1. Review of the facility's Menus policy dated April 2006, showed Menus shall meet the nutritional needs of the resident in accordance with the attending physician's orders and the Recommended Dietary Allowances. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 12, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2025Standard11 findings
  • Feb 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2024Standard8 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Apr 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2023Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Mar 1, 2022Standard18 findings
  • Jan 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 7, 2019Standard19 findings
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Mar 2, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Dec 16, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Mar 2, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 13, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 21, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2011—10 findings
  • Jan 28, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction