Deficiency Index

River City Living Community

Jefferson City, Missouri · CCN 265482

39 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
129
Surveys
39
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/39

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
87
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN
County
Cole
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Apr 20, 2026

203 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.873.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.21—
Annual nurse turnover73.1%60.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$237,995 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.0%K—L—
Actual harmG12.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1734.0%E2040.0%F510.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C510.0%
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 129 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6586×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6073×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at River City Living Community, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 26, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from sexual abuse, when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A sexually assaulted the resident. The facility failed to protect the resident from further abuse when CNA D witnessed the assault, did not intervene, and did not report it immediately. CNA A worked an additional 18 overnight shifts after the sexual abuse was observed. The facility census was 52. The Administrator was notified on [DATE], of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF609Jun 26, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #1) to the administrator on 4/17/24, after witnessing the event. The alleged perpetrator worked 18 additional shifts before the nurse aide reported what was seen to the administrator on 5/13/24. The administrator failed to report the allegation of sexual abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hour timeframe. The facility census was 52. The Administrator was notified on 06/26/24, of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 04/17/24. The IJ was removed on 05/30/24 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 28, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to prevent an injury to one resident (Resident #3) when a Nursing Assistant (NA) used an electric nail file to apply acrylic nails to resident's fingernails and cut his/her finger which caused an infection and hospitalization. The facility census was 44.1. Review of facility's Care of Nails - Fingers and Toes policy, undated, showed the purpose of the policy is to provide cleanliness, comfort, and to prevent spread of infection. Nursing assistants may perform nail care on the residents who are not at risk for complications of infection. The licensed nurse or podiatrist must perform nail care on residents suffering from diabetes or vascular disease. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Oct 4, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus to all residents. The facility census was 39 with a capacity of 87. 1. Review of the facility's Food Preparation and Distribution policy, dated May 2015, showed measured utensils are used to serve proportions as described on menu. 2. Review of the facility menus, undated (Week 2, Day 10), showed the menus directed staff to provide the residents on regular diets six ounces of stroganoff, 1/2 cup (four ounces) of noodles and 1/2 cup of vegetable blend at the lunch meal. Observation on 10/01/24 at 12:41 P.M., showed [NAME] I served the residents a #6 scoop (5.3 ounces) of stroganoff, three ounces of noodles, and three ounces of mixed vegetables. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 4, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The census was 39 with a capacity of 87. 1. Review of the facility's Safe Food Handling policy, dated May 2015 showed all food, including bulk items, should be tightly sealed with an identifying label and date. 2. Observation on 10/01/24 at 10:01 A.M., showed the reach in refrigerator contained: -A plastic container of pineapple which was not in its original container and was undated; -A plastic container of hot dogs which was undated; -An opened and undated bag of lettuce; -An opened and undated container of tuna salad; -A cardboard flat of eggs which contained five broken eggs; -A… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 129 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 20, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 6, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2024Standard11 findings
Show the 31 earlier surveys
  • Jun 26, 2024Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2023Standard15 findings
  • Feb 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2017Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 7, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Mar 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Jun 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 25, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 19, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 25, 2011—10 findings
  • Apr 25, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 17, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction