Deficiency Index

Ashford Gardens

Houston, Texas · CCN 675423

49 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
158
Surveys
49
Harm or worse
15
Immediate jeopardy
9
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file40/49

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
202
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CANTEX CONTINUING CARE
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.253.26
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.28—
Annual nurse turnover43.0%55.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$11,009 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K13.8%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1557.7%E830.8%F27.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 158 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • F5631×

    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ashford Gardens, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686May 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and ensure that residents received the necessary treatment and services, to promote healing and prevent infection for 2 of 9 residents (CR#1 and Resident #2) reviewed for pressure ulcer in that: -The facility failed to identify and treat pressure sore on CR#1's penis, left foot 5th toe, Right Toe Digit 1, great -The facility failed to provide CR#1 with an air mattress for 20 days with multiple diagnoses of Stage 4 pressure ulcers. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Mar 21, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . -The facility failed to initiate and conduct CPR immediately after finding CR#1 unresponsive. -The facility failed to immediately contact 911 for EMS services; EMS was not contacted until approximately 31 minutes after the resident was found unresponsive. -The facility to perform CPR appropriately as LVN B instructed a CNA to clean CR#1 of a bowel movement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 facility and 2 of 16 residents (Resident #217 and Resident #218) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to establish and provide documentation for a water management program as part of the infection control program. 2. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeper L wore the appropriate PPE for contact precautions when she was cleaning the room for Resident #217. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Oct 27, 2023

    Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance and is nourishing, palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchens in the facility. -The facility failed to ensure the dessert cook prepared food according to the recipe and utilized all ingredients in the specified amounts which resulted in residents receiving food that did not have nutritive value and flavor. This failure had the potential to affect all facility residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 28, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. -The facility failed to ensure dishes, utensils, and pots/pans were cleaned under sanitary conditions. -Facility staff failed to test for proper chemical sanitation in the manual wash/3-compartment sink. -Facility staff failed to demonstrate proper use of test strips to establish accurate chemical sanitation in the manual wash/3-compartment sink. -Facility staff failed to monitor ware-washing equipment to ensure adequate temperature was reached to for sanitary cleaning. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness, inadequate sanitation, and cross-contamination. […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 158 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2026Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Mar 31, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 10, 2025Standard6 findings
Show the 41 earlier surveys
  • May 17, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 27, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Sep 13, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Mar 21, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 28, 2021Standard9 findings
  • Jun 20, 2019Standard9 findings
  • May 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2019Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Jun 29, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Jun 12, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Feb 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2016Complaint6 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 14, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 23, 2016Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 9, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 22, 2015Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Mar 28, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Dec 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2013—3 findings
  • Feb 11, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 25, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 14, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2012—8 findings
  • Jun 3, 2011—2 findings
  • Dec 2, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction