Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce
Staten Island, New York · CCN 335332
16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 55
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 378
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ARCHCARE
- County
- Richmond
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.
Last survey on record
Jul 9, 2025
488 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.35 | 3.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.06 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 27.9% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1781.0% | E419.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5851×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F6021×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Mar 28, 2023
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/21/23 through 3/28/23, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination by supporting resident choice. Specifically, residents' bathing preferences were not honored. This was evident for 2 of the 2 residents reviewed for Choices out of 38 sampled residents. (Resident #5, and #22). The findings are: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis, Quadriplegia, and Trigeminal Neuralgia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 as cognitively intact and dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The MDS documented that no rejection of care occurred. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 28, 2023
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/21/23 to 3/28/23, the facility did not ensure that resident or resident's representative were offered the opportunity to participate in the revision and/or review of the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, resident and resident's representatives were not consistently invited to participate in their care plan meetings and a care plan was not revised to reflect use of a hand roll. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Mar 28, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00312017) survey from 3/21/23 through 3/28/23, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staffing to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident. Specifically, resident units did not have adequate staff to care for a census of up to 300 residents, with multiple residents reporting being given bed baths and not receiving showers as scheduled. The findings include but are not limited to: The Facility Assessment (FA), with the last revised date of February 2023, documented a capacity of 300 residents. The required staff are Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs); night shift 25, day shift 57, and evening shift 52. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF563Aug 9, 2021
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during an unannounced Focused Infection Control Survey (Event ID: RF1X11) conducted 8/9/21, the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing, subject to the residents' right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of other residents. Specifically, the facility suspended all visitation on 7/28/2021 for all residents due to COVID-19 cases on 5 of 7 Units. Residents not on quarantine related to COVID-19 exposure or COVID-19 positive status were not permitted to have outdoor visitation. This was evident for 2 of 7 resident floors (Floors 5 and 8). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jul 9, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 07/01/2025 to 07/09/2025, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #427) of 4 residents reviewed for Catheter out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #427's suprapubic catheter drainage bag and tubing were not covered with a privacy bag.The findings include:The facility policy titled Residents Right to Privacy and Dignity that was last reviewed on 01/2025 documented that residents are treated in a dignified manner and their privacy rights are upheld as outlined in the resident bill of rights.The facility's policy titled Close Urinary system that was last reviewed on… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 55 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 9, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jul 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
- Mar 14, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Aug 9, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Feb 19, 2020Standard1 finding
- Dec 12, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Sep 30, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 30, 2014Standard2 findings
- Sep 17, 2013—9 findings
- Oct 22, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 31, 2012—2 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 9, 2011—2 findings
- Jul 29, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction