Apple Rehab Uncasville
Uncasville, Connecticut · CCN 075438
47 surveys since 2010, 24 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 219
- Surveys
- 47
- Harm or worse
- 24
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 130
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- APPLE REHAB
- County
- Southeastern Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Dec 16, 2025
328 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.18 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.2% | 35.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,065 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G24.8% | H— | I24.8% |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2457.1% | E921.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B49.5% | C12.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Apple Rehab Uncasville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 12, 2022
Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy on 9/2/22. The facility further failed ensure residents were free from neglect by failing to provide incontinent care to 36 residents on the secured dementia unit in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 12, 2022
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse (Resident #1), the facility failed to supervise a resident who had a history of wandering and on multiple occasions, was assaulted by other residents for wandering in their rooms and further failed to provide adequate supervision for two (2) residents, (Resident #2 and Resident #6), who were assessed as a danger to others. The lack of supervision resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder and [CONDITION(S)]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 16, 2022
Based on observation, review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), reviewed for elopement risk, the facility failed to adequately supervise, assess for elopement risk, maintain a secured environment to prevent elopement, and monitor the wander guard for placement and function in accordance with facility policy. As a result, Resident #1 eloped from the secured unit and courtyard and was located approximately one mile away from the facility on the highway. […]
- Actual harm, widespreadF600Aug 8, 2023
Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequsate staffing levels to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for thirty (31) residents who required assistance with turning, repositioning, transfers and incontinent care, (Resident #1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31). The findings include: a. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment and brain cancer. […]
- Actual harm, widespreadF725Aug 8, 2023
Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, observations, interviews, and policy reviews, for thirty (31) residents who required assistance with turning, repositioning, transfers and incontinent care, (Resident #1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 31), the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. The findings include: a. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment and brain cancer. […]
Read 43 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 43 of 219 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 16, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 22, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Sep 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 5, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Dec 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 39 earlier surveys
- Aug 8, 2023Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- May 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 9, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 12, 2022Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 16, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 7, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
- May 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 8, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 25, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Dec 28, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Dec 11, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Nov 19, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Aug 24, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Aug 18, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 18, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Jun 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 31, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 20, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 23, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 7, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 25, 2019Standard14 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 12, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 2, 2018Complaint3 findings
- May 23, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- May 11, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 10, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jun 16, 2016Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 24, 2015Standard17 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 10, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 26, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
- Dec 9, 2013Standard5 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 11, 2013—6 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 14, 2012—7 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2011—20 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 7, 2010—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction