Altercare Post-Acute Rehab Center
Kent, Ohio · CCN 365300
14 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 26
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 79
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ALTERCARE
- County
- Portage
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 12, 2026
242 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.96 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.78 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.5% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Altercare Post-Acute Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Mar 12, 2026
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of a significant change in condition and failed to notify the physician when nursing staff independently held physician ordered medications. This affected one resident (#169) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #169 revealed an admission date of 12/11/25 and a discharge date [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 12, 2026
Based on record review, review of the emergency transport report, review of hospital records, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #169's insulin was administered as prescribed and failed to ensure timely transfer to the emergency room when a significant change in condition was identified. This affected one (Resident #169) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 66.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #169 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Mar 12, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, review of manufacture's guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Four errors were observed in 34 opportunities resulting in a 11.76% medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #114) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 66.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed an admission date 02/24/26 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, malnutrition, embolism of right upper extremity and bilateral lower extremities, anemia and hypotension.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #114 had moderate cognitive impairment and required… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Mar 12, 2026
Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #169. This affected one (Resident #169) out of nine residents' records reviewed during a complaint investigation. The facility's census was 66.Findings include:A review of Resident #169's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/25 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, cognitive communication deficit, orthostatic hypotension, dehydration, depression, generalized anxiety disorder and acute kidney failure.A review of Resident #169's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required partial to moderate assistance with bathing and with personal hygiene. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Aug 17, 2023
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided to Resident #7. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter care. The census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pleural conditions-hydropneumothorax, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, chronic atrial fibrillation, constipation, hypertension, dysphagia, ataxia, vertigo, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, anxiety, insomnia, restlessness/agitation, and cerebrovascular disease. Review of Resident # Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated revealed the resident was alert and oriented. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 26 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 12, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Aug 17, 2023Standard1 finding
- Nov 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 22, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2019Standard2 findings
- Apr 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 2, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Oct 4, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Aug 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Apr 19, 2012—4 findings
- Apr 19, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 17, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction