Aliya of Palos Park
Palos Park, Illinois · CCN 146053
44 surveys since 2012, 20 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 134
- Surveys
- 44
- Harm or worse
- 20
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 129
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ALIYA HEALTHCARE
- County
- Cook
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 232 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Illinois.
Last survey on record
May 11, 2026
182 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.12 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.58 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.8% | 43.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $379,645 across 5 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G918.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3468.0% | E36.0% | F24.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6847×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6865×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aliya of Palos Park, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Jan 30, 2024
Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure one resident's airway (R4) with a tracheostomy was free of obstruction by not removing the inner cannula during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) attempts. This affected one of three (R4) residents reviewed for emergency management. This failure resulted in R4 remaining in respiratory distress and the facility was unable to locate a spare trach tube to provide emergency oxygen during a Code Blue. R4 was transported to the local emergency room and pronounced deceased on the same day. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R4 developed respiratory distress and staff were unable to locate inner trach tube to provide oxygen and clear R4's airway. V7 (Administrator) was notified on [DATE] at 10:54 AM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 4, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective care plan interventions for one resident (R2) who was reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing a right hip fracture as a result of a fall.Findings include:R2 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: delirium, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, insomnia, psychosis, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, and lack of coordination.Fall Risk Evaluation dated 7/13/2025 shows R2 has a fall risk score of 22.0 indicating resident is at high risk for falls.It is to be noted that R2 was sent to the emergency room following a fall on 7/16/2025 and has not returned to the… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 21, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their hospice policy and care plan for one (R2) out of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift for transfer from chair to bed. This failure resulted in R2 sustaining a laceration on her left leg that required R2 to be sent to the emergency room for suturing. The after-emergency room summary indicates that R2 was treated for laceration repair. The facility's final summary investigation indicates that R2 returned to the facility with 17 sutures. Findings include:On 8/19/2025 at 11:37 AM, V4(Hospice CNA) said that V4 was transferring R2 to the bed, and V4 bumped R2's leg on the bed. V4 said that was when V4 saw the blood and V4 ran to get the nurse. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jul 31, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive assessment and implement wound care management for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for skin alteration. This deficiency resulted in R1's abrasion on the left great toe deteriorated to necrosis, gangrene, infection of left foot, and needs amputation. Findings include:R1 is an [AGE] year-old, male, admitted in the facility on 07/03/25 with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications; Pain in Right Foot; Pain in Left Foot; and Multiple Subsegmental Thrombotic Pulmonary Emboli without Acute Cor Pulmonale. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 25, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat elevated blood sugars that were above the resident's baseline before it got to a critical level and the facility failed to put in any interventions for a resident experiencing vomiting and diarrhea to prevent dehydration. This affected two of three (R81, R84) reviewed for nursing quality of care. This failure resulted in R84 being sent to the hospital with a blood sugar level of 521 mg/dL and was diagnosed with uncontrolled diabetes and R81 being sent to the hospital to be treated for severe dehydration after being diagnosed with norovirus. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 134 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 9, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Nov 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 31, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 25, 2025Standard15 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 36 earlier surveys
- Jul 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 17, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 30, 2024Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 7, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 24, 2023Standard10 findings
- Oct 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 4, 2022Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jul 1, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Aug 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2019Standard3 findings
- Feb 7, 2019Standard1 finding
- Oct 23, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 5, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 11, 2018Standard6 findings
- Nov 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2017Standard3 findings
- Dec 18, 2015Standard7 findings
- Feb 26, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 30, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jan 6, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 28, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 7, 2014—4 findings
- Aug 21, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 20, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 6, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 3, 2012—17 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction