Deficiency Index

Abbeyville Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent

Lancaster, Pennsylvania · CCN 395199

56 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
182
Surveys
56
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file45/56

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
172
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
GENESIS HEALTHCARE
County
Lancaster
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 173 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.373.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover55.1%49.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2573.5%E720.6%F12.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 182 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6846×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6553×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Abbeyville Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF623Mar 8, 2024

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that written notices of emergency transfers to the hospital were provided to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 6 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 78, 111, 112, 119, 126 and 146). Findings include: Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed Resident 78 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. No documentation was provided indicating the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified. Review of Resident 111's clinical record revealed Resident 111 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Apr 2, 2026

    Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the office of the state long term care ombudsman of emergency transfers for 10 of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 10, 14, 20, 46, 84, 91, 126, 134, and 165).Findings include:Finding include Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on March 11, 2026, due to abnormal vitals. Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's clinical record and facility documentation failed to reveal evidence that the State Ombudsman's office was notified of Resident 1's transfer and admission to the hospital. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Aug 19, 2025

    Based on review of clinical record was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to discharge for five of five residents (Residents R1, R6, R7, R8, and R15).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Discharge Planning Process dated 10/20/24, indicated the facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process. Discharge planning will begin upon admission and be completed as part of the Person-Centered Care Plan process. Review of the facility policy, Person Centered Care Plan dated 10/20/24, indicated, Care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a patient's medical, nursing, nutrition, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments for newly admitted patients. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 19, 2025

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the wounds for four of six residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, and R5).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Skin Integrity and Wound Management dated 10/20/24, indicated the facility will provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/24/25, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, presence of a hip fracture, and need for assistance with personal care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Aug 19, 2025

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system that allows residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area in four of five nursing units (Arcadia, [NAME], Roosevelt, and [NAME] nursing units).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Call Lights dated 10/20/24, indicated, Patients will have a call light or alternative communication device at each patient's bedside, toilet, and bathing room to allow patients to call for assistance when unattended. Staff will respond to call lights and communication devices promptly. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 182 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Aug 19, 2025Complaint6 findings
  • Feb 7, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Jan 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 48 earlier surveys
  • Apr 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Aug 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 28, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Mar 25, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 1, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 17, 2018Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • May 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 6, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 29, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Sep 15, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2017Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 11, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Mar 20, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 21, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Sep 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Nov 6, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2013—5 findings
  • Feb 14, 2013—4 findings
  • Dec 24, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 23, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 26, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2011—4 findings
  • Aug 1, 2011—4 findings
  • Feb 24, 2011—2 findings
  • Nov 15, 2010—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 21, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction