Abbey Senior Health
O Fallon, Missouri · CCN 265839
20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 65
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 55
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- St. Charles
- Medicare-certified since
- 2011
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.74 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.6% | 57.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1548.4% | E1032.3% | F39.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B26.5% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6552×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5721×
Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
- F5741×
The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Abbey Senior Health, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 9, 2023
Based on record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure seven residents (Resident (R) 3, R207, R27, R31, R22, R39, R52, and R40) of 24 sampled residents remained free of accidents/hazards and received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure coffee that was accessible to residents and served to residents was within a safe temperature range. On [DATE], R3 spilled coffee on her lap resulting in blisters on both sides of her inner thigh, and on [DATE], R40 spilled coffee on his lap. The Director of Nursing (DON) failed to ensure R207, R27, R31, R22, R39 and R52, who had falls, lacked adequate supervision, a comprehensive fall investigation after each fall, and remained free from injury. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 25, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food to residents in a safe and sanitary manner when staff failed to employ proper hand hygiene and gloving practices and failed to store food in a manner that prevented potential contamination. Staff failed to ensure beverage and ice machines were clean and an air gap was present at ice machine drains. Staff failed to document and demonstrate knowledge of the use and testing parameters of the facility's dishwashing machines to ensure dishes were cleaned and sanitized properly. The facility census was 49. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Jun 9, 2023
Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment updated 11/2021 for 2022, revealed, Quality Assurance overall has been delegated as a top oversight priority of our new DON (Director of Nursing). The Q1/A (Quality Improvement/Assurance) process, its' administration and report to the QA Committee and Administrator about progress, problem areas and trouble shooting [sic] will be an outgrowth of weekly UR/High Risk meetings, Monthly QA review and quarterly meetings. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Jun 9, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was maintained accurately. Specifically, the Facility Assessment had not been reviewed/revised annually and did not accurately reflect the current resident population. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, revised October 2018, revealed, Once a year, and as needed, a designated team conducts a facility-wide assessment to ensure that the resources are available to meet the specific needs of our residents. This policy further revealed, The facility assessment includes a detailed review of the resident population. This part of the assessment includes . c. factors that affect the overall acuity of the residents, such as the number and percentage of residents with . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Jun 11, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate transfers and/or discharges to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (a trained advocate, often a volunteer, who works to protect the rights and improve the quality of life for residents in long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities) for three residents (Resident #44, #70 and #34), in a review of 14 sampled residents, and for two discharged residents (Residents #4 and #38). The facility census was 49. Review of the undated facility policy, Transfer and Discharge from the Facility, showed the following:-The facility forwards a copy of all discharge notices to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman;A. Facility staff will document in the residents' record:iv. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 65 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
- Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2024Standard9 findings
- Jun 9, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Dec 20, 2018Standard4 findings
- Mar 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 12, 2017Standard1 finding
- Sep 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2016Standard3 findings
- Sep 6, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 13, 2016Standard2 findings
- Oct 30, 2014Standard6 findings
- Jan 9, 2014—1 finding
- Nov 14, 2012—5 findings
- Feb 10, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 3, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction