Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have certified resident rooms equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy for 4 of 55 rooms (Rooms #101A/101B, 103A/103B, 201A/201B, 226A /226B). This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of residing in rooms without proper furnishings and privacy.Findings included: During an initial tour of the facility on 08/25/26 at 9:05 AM observations were made of Rooms #101 and #103, which also served as the surveyor teams office space during the facility's annual survey. The room had three round tables and 12 chairs. DON stated, the room was a dining room. Both rooms did not have any equipment to indicate there was a functional call light system. …
F910 citations in Texas
Environmental Deficiencies
Ensure resident rooms meet each resident's needs.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Texas cites F910 more often than its own record predicts
7.19 times the share F910 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Texas in 2024, this is the portion that was F910.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Texas surveyors wrote
F910 findings written in Texas, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have certified resident rooms equipped for adequate nursing care, comfort, and privacy for 33 of 85 rooms (Rooms 701-710, 712-714, 717-722, 801-813, and 815). The facility failed to have 38 Title 18 beds in B Building resident ready. The facility failed to have 24 Dually Certified (Title 19/19) beds in B Building resident ready. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of residing in rooms without proper furnishings and privacy. …
What else Texas surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction