F882 in South Dakota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
South Dakota cites F882 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.85×
1.85 times the share F882 takes of citations nationally.
Share of South Dakota citations0.34%
Of every deficiency written in South Dakota in 2025, this is the portion that was F882.
South Dakota0.34%
National0.18%
Share of all citations that were F882.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What South Dakota surveyors wrote
F882 findings written in South Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 3, 2026
Based on interview, job description review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure they had a designated qualified infection preventionist (IP) onsite who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program and activities to prevent and control infections. Findings include:1. Interview on 9/1/26 at 9:06 a.m. with administrator A revealed there was no designated IP employed at the facility. She stated the previous IP was licensed practical nurse (LPN) D stepped down from the position in June 2026. 2. Interview on 9/3/26 at 3:40 p.m. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction