Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
F811 in Wisconsin. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Wisconsin cites F811 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.47×
2.47 times the share F811 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Wisconsin citations0.04%
Of every deficiency written in Wisconsin in 2025, this is the portion that was F811.
Wisconsin0.04%
National0.01%
Share of all citations that were F811.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Wisconsin surveyors wrote
F811 findings written in Wisconsin, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedDecember 4, 2025
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R8 and R13) of 2 sampled residents were assessed for safety and had care plans to guide assistance by Paid Feeding Assistants (PFAs).The facility did not assess if R8 and R13 were appropriate to be assisted by PFAs prior to using PFAs to assist R8 and R13 with dining. In addition, R8 and R13 did not have care plans that indicated they could be fed by PFAs.Findings include:The facility's undated Dining Assistant policy indicates: Dining Assistants will follow the requirements of federal regulations and the Wisconsin Feeding Assistant Program .I. The following individuals are able to provide feeding assistance: .C. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction