Deficiency Index

F772 citations in Washington

Administration Deficiencies

Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F772 in Washington. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2024

Washington cites F772 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share1.95×

1.95 times the share F772 takes of citations nationally.

Share of Washington citations0.03%

Of every deficiency written in Washington in 2024, this is the portion that was F772.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Washington surveyors wrote

F772 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJune 18, 2024

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality and timeliness of laboratory services for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 19) reviewed for urinary catheter or Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This failure placed residents at risk for delay in diagnosis of infection, of sepsis, of potential complications, of increased length of stay, and of a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. …

Port Washington Post Acute

What else Washington surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction