F760 in New Hampshire. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Hampshire cites F760 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.55×
0.55 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of New Hampshire citations0.72%
Of every deficiency written in New Hampshire in 2025, this is the portion that was F760.
New Hampshire0.72%
National1.30%
Share of all citations that were F760.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Hampshire surveyors wrote
F760 findings written in New Hampshire, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedMay 22, 2024
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents remain free from significant medication errors, which resulted in a resident needing interventions for hypoglycemia, including hospital observation for one of three residents reviewed for insulin use. (Resident Identifier #1).
Findings include:
Interview on 5/22/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Resident #1 revealed he/she had received too much insulin a little while ago and ended up going to the hospital as a result. …
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors which resulted in a resident requiring hospitalization for multiple nights in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident identifier is #1.)Findings include:Review on 8/27/26 of Resident #1's progress note, dated 8/11/26, revealed Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room because a medication error had occurred and nursing staff were concerned about his electrolyte levels.Review on 8/27/26 of Resident #1's laboratory results, dated 8/11/26, revealed that Resident #1's Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) was 112 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) and creatinine was 6.80 mg/dL. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 29, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of insulin medication errors for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for significant medication error in a final sample of 19 residents. (Resident identifier are #62 and #70.) Findings include:Resident #62Interview on 5/28/26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. with Resident #62 revealed he/she received someone else's insulin yesterday afternoon. Resident #62 stated that a male staff member approached her in the dining room and asked, Are you [first name omitted]?Review on 5/28/26 of Resident #62's provider note dated 5/27/26 revealed that .Nursing discovered that this pt likely received another pt's insulin (with the same first name). …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction