Based on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, for two (2) of 33 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure the licensed pharmacist conducted a monthly drug regimen review for one resident and the attending physician, or designee failed to respond to pharmacists' recommendations for one resident. Residents #6 and #26 The findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled 'Medication Review' with a review date of 02/11/2026 documented, in part: 6. …
F756 citations in District of Columbia
Drug regimen review · Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
District of Columbia cites F756 more often than its own record predicts
3.04 times the share F756 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2025, this is the portion that was F756.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F756 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of District of Columbia citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1.82% | 1.93× |
| 2024 | 1.02% | 1.25× |
| 2025 | 2.40% | 3.04× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction