Based on observation, record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure interventions implemented to care for a resident with dementia were revised based on assessment of the resident's condition when quarterly elopement and wandering risk assessments for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #5) documented a wander alarm was not indicated and a Wander Guard device remained in use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident being unnecessarily confined within the facility and experiencing feelings of isolation. …
F744 citations in Nevada
Dementia care · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Nevada cites F744 less often than its own record predicts
0.61 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2024, this is the portion that was F744.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F744 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Nevada surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction