F725 in Wisconsin. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Wisconsin cites F725 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.75×
0.75 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Wisconsin citations0.58%
Of every deficiency written in Wisconsin in 2025, this is the portion that was F725.
Wisconsin0.58%
National0.78%
Share of all citations that were F725.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Wisconsin surveyors wrote
F725 findings written in Wisconsin, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
L · Immediate jeopardy, widespreadSeptember 12, 2024
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not have a licensed nurse on duty to meet the needs of residents for approximately 2.5 hours on the [DATE] PM shift. This had the potential to affect 23 of 23 residents (R) residing in the facility.
On [DATE], an agency nurse who worked the AM shift left the facility without licensed nurse coverage for the PM shift. The facility was without a nurse for approximately 2.5 hours.
Due to not having a licensed nurse on duty, 3 residents (R10, R16, and R7) did not receive blood glucose monitoring in accordance with physician orders. Fourteen residents (R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R5, R1, R13, R14, R15, R16, R7, R3, and R17) did not receive medication in accordance with physician orders. …
Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility did not ensure they had sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing care and services to all the residents and assure resident safety as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.
Example#1:
The facility did not ensure 8 of 14 residents (R2, R18, R21, R34, R15, R10, R3, R48) received prompt response to their needs and call lights due to insufficient staffing as voiced during individual resident interviews and resident group meeting. …
F · No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadJune 24, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to all residents to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Surveyor conducted a record review of the facility's nursing staff schedule and verified the facility is not providing staffing levels that meet the facility's identified staffing needs documented in the facility assessment for the night shift.
The facility did not consistently designate a licensed nurse to serve as a charge nurse on each tour of duty. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction