Recite from 05/22/24 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had a physician visit at least every 60 days for 4 (R #1, R #9, R #10, and R #118) of 5 (R #1, R #9, R #10, R #118, and R #130) residents reviewed for physician's visits. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the required medical assessment which could cause a delay in care and treatment of medical conditions. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: 1. R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #1 was seen by the Medical Director (clinician who oversees and guides the care provider to nursing home residents) on 12/29/24. 3. R #1 was seen by the Medical Director on 05/10/25. B. …
F712 citations in New Mexico
Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies
Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
New Mexico cites F712 less often than its own record predicts
0.84 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in New Mexico in 2025, this is the portion that was F712.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Mexico surveyors wrote
F712 findings written in New Mexico, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of New Mexico citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.37% | 3.51× |
| 2024 | 0.21% | 1.90× |
| 2025 | 0.11% | 0.84× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else New Mexico surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction