F686 in Utah. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Utah cites F686 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.45×
0.45 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Utah citations0.89%
Of every deficiency written in Utah in 2025, this is the portion that was F686.
Utah0.89%
National1.97%
Share of all citations that were F686.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Utah surveyors wrote
F686 findings written in Utah, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedApril 13, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 5 of 51 sample residents. Specifically, wound care was not provided to residents as ordered, and one resident did not have physician evaluations or orders for a pressure injury. The deficient practice identified for resident 61 was found to have occurred at an immediate jeopardy level and deficient practice for residents 1. 15, 17, and 29 were found to have occurred at a harm level. …
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, for 1 out of 40 sampled residents, the facility did not implement pressure ulcer interventions to prevent infection and new ulcers from developing. This will be cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 3. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 14, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. Specifically, for 1 out of 54 sampled residents, a resident developed a pressure injury in house due to the bandage being too tight. Resident identifier: 12. Findings included:Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with skin ulcer, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of left leg above knee, and peripheral vascular disease.A care plan Focus initiated on 3/4/26, documented… …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction