F679 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F679 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.71×
1.71 times the share F679 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Minnesota citations0.85%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F679.
Minnesota0.85%
National0.50%
Share of all citations that were F679.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F679 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJune 5, 2026
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and well-being of a resident(s) and failed to ensure residents were informed of available activities for 2 of 2 resident (R3 and R37) reviewed who identified group activities and participation in favorite activities as important (R3, R37).
Findings include:
R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction