F646 in Idaho. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Idaho cites F646 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share5.07×
5.07 times the share F646 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Idaho citations0.33%
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2025, this is the portion that was F646.
Idaho0.33%
National0.07%
Share of all citations that were F646.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F646 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 3, 2026
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the PASRR Level I/Level II information was updated when there was a change in diagnosis and/or treatment. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#21 and #37) reviewed for PASRR. This deficient practice created the potential for adverse outcomes when the facility did not notify the state PASRR authority or obtain updated PASRR determinations after new mental health related diagnoses and treatment were identified, resulting in inaccurate and incomplete PASRR information used to guide resident assessment and care planning. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction