Deficiency Index

F642 citations in District of Columbia

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

AKALARAZCACOCTDCDEFLGAGUHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMAMDMEMIMNMOMSMTNCNDNENHNJNMNVNYOHOKORPAPRRISCSDTNTXUTVAVTWAWIWVWY
F642 in District of Columbia. Pick another state for the same tag.

No F642 citations were recorded in District of Columbia for 2025. That means none appear in the CMS file for that year — not that the requirement does not apply.

In the surveyor’s words

What District of Columbia surveyors wrote

F642 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 26, 2022

Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 63 sampled residents, facility staff knowingly falsified Resident #1's Discharge - Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Liver Cell Carcinoma and Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: intact cognition; required supervision and set-up only for activities of daily living; and no functional limitation in range of motion. 03/31/22 at 5:24 PM .Social Service Note/Overnight stay . spoke with resident and his nephew . …

Unique Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC

What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction