F639 in Connecticut. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2024
Connecticut cites F639 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share13.42×
13.42 times the share F639 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Connecticut citations0.06%
Of every deficiency written in Connecticut in 2024, this is the portion that was F639.
Connecticut0.06%
National0.00%
Share of all citations that were F639.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Connecticut surveyors wrote
F639 findings written in Connecticut, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternFebruary 21, 2024
Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #57) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to have 15 months of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments readily available. The findings include:
Resident #57's diagnoses included vascular dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, and heart failure.
During a review of Resident #57's nutritional needs on 2/15/24 at 10:17 AM, the resident's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was not available in the clinical record and was not noted to be filed on the nursing unit. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction