F638 in Oklahoma. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Oklahoma cites F638 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share3.51×
3.51 times the share F638 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Oklahoma citations0.40%
Of every deficiency written in Oklahoma in 2025, this is the portion that was F638.
Oklahoma0.40%
National0.11%
Share of all citations that were F638.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Oklahoma surveyors wrote
F638 findings written in Oklahoma, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternJune 12, 2026
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed on a quarterly basis and submitted within the required timeframe for 17 (Residents #33, #12, #16, #17, #18, #22, #23, #3, #35, #38, #40, #43, #44, #45, #5, #54, and #8) of 18 residents reviewed for resident assessments. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, revised 09/2010, specified, 1. The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: c. at least quarterly. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction