F582 in Connecticut. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Connecticut cites F582 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.15×
0.15 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Connecticut citations0.06%
Of every deficiency written in Connecticut in 2025, this is the portion that was F582.
Connecticut0.06%
National0.41%
Share of all citations that were F582.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Connecticut surveyors wrote
F582 findings written in Connecticut, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 11, 2026
Based on review of the clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #83, #84, and #85) reviewed for beneficiary notification, the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to the residents upon being discharged from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining. The findings include:1.Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerosis with gangrene of the left foot, below the knee amputation 17 years ago, and peripheral arterial diseaseThe Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/7/25 identified Resident #83 was admitted for short term rehabilitation with a goal to discharge back to the community. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJuly 27, 2026
Based on staff interview and record review for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3, Resident #6 and Resident #100) reviewed for Beneficiary Notices, the facility failed to provide the necessary Medicare Beneficiary Notices when benefits were due to be exhausted. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare as the payor source. Resident #3 no longer required Medicare benefits and benefits ended on 4/27/26. Resident #3 remained in the facility after Medicare services ended with Medicare days remaining, but an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) was not provided to Resident #3 or the resident representative prior to Medicare coverage ending. 2. Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility with Medicare as the payor source. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction