Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the amount of the surety bond was comparable to the amount of the resident funds entrusted to the facility. This was evident during a review of Personal Funds during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/07/24 at 8:42 AM during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Corporate Accounts Receivable Manager (Staff #33), Staff #33 indicated that resident's personal funds were kept in separate accounts and that the facility had a surety bond to cover the total amount of residents' personal funds. …
F570 citations in Maryland
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Maryland cites F570 more often than its own record predicts
2.70 times the share F570 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Maryland in 2024, this is the portion that was F570.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Maryland surveyors wrote
F570 findings written in Maryland, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on the review, on [DATE], of the facility's existing surety bond and on the interview of the facility's business office personnel the facility failed to have a surety bond. Findings include: As of [DATE], there was no evidence that the facility had continued its existing surety bond or had purchased a new one. The facility's existing surety bond expired on [DATE].
What else Maryland surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction