Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had expressed the need/desire to work, had previously worked and agreed to the work arrangements, was given the choice to perform voluntary services at the facility for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at risk of confusion/frustration with facility staff and an increased risk of behaviors regarding their choice/arrangement to work.Finding included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised January 2025, showed the facility resident had the right to participate in the development of their plan of care and they would be .permitted successive degrees of freedom of movement and opportunities/responsibility for… …
F566 citations in Washington
Resident Rights Deficiencies
1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
No F566 citations were recorded in Washington for 2025. That means none appear in the CMS file for that year — not that the requirement does not apply.
In the surveyor’s words
What Washington surveyors wrote
F566 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Washington surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction