Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure hospice aide visits were provided in accordance with the plan of care for four (Patients #1, 7, 10 and 17) of 23 patients. --- Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 12/05/23 to 03/03/24 and plan of care updates dated 01/04/24 and 01/18/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of two visits per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 01/15/24 documented the reason for the missed visit as bad weather for the week of 01/14/24 to 01/20/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care dated 02/09/24 to 05/08/24 and plan of care updates dated 02/15/24, 02/29/24, 03/14/24, 03/28/24 and 04/11/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 02/14/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 02/11/24 to 02/17/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. A hospice aide missed visit dated 03/25/24 and 03/29/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 03/24/24 to 03/30/24 (one of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/05/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 03/31/24 to 04/06/24 (two of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #10 A review of the plan of care dated 03/27/24 to 06/24/24 and plan of care updates dated 04/04/24, 04/18/24 and 05/02/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of one visit per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/17/24 and 04/19/24 documented the no reason for the missed visit for the week of 04/14/24 to 04/20/24 (one of three completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. Patient #17 A review of the plan of care dated 04/23/24 to 06/21/24 and plan of care update dated 04/25/24 showed a hospice aide frequency of two visits per week for one week and three visits per week for 12 weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A hospice aide missed visit dated 04/24/24 documented the reason for the missed visit was due to a refusal of bath for the week of 04/23/24 to 04/24/24 (one of two completed visits for this week). Documentation showed no refusal of other services outlined in the plan of care, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no change in the ordered frequency. On 05/02/24 at 3:30 pm., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequencies were not met in accordance with the ordered frequencies in the plan of care for Patients #1,7 and 10. On 05/03/24 at 10:16 am., Staff B stated the hospice aide frequency was not met in accordance with the ordered frequencies in the plan of care for Patient #17.
Every finding on record at Saint Francis Hospital, Inc
Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 371503
3 findings across 1 survey, in the inspector's own words.
The inspector’s own words from form CMS-2567, unedited, including CMS’s own spacing. Names and some dates are redacted by CMS.
Survey of May 3, 2024
3 findingsBased on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the plan of care was individualized and fully developed to include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness for eleven (Patients #2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16 and 18) of 23 patients reviewed. --- Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 02/21/24 to 05/21/24 documented a primary diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of left lung and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #3 A plan of care dated 04/24/24 to 07/22/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #4 A plan of care dated 02/15/24 to 04/14/24 documented a primary diagnosis of late effect cerebrovascular accident and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #5 A plan of care dated 01/03/24 to 04/01/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #7 A plan of care dated 02/09/24 to 05/08/24 documented a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #9 A plan of care dated 04/12/23 to 07/10/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of larynx and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #10 A plan of care dated 03/27/24 to 06/24/24 documented a primary diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #11 A plan of care dated 04/10/24 to 07/06/24 documented a primary diagnosis of late effect cerebrovascular accident and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #14 A plan of care dated 01/24/24 to 03/23/24 documented a primary diagnosis of atherosclerosis of native coronary artery and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #16 A plan of care dated 04/20/24 to 07/18/24 documented a primary diagnosis of cancer of the colon and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. Patient #18 A plan of care dated 04/12/24 to 07/10/24 documented a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and showed no individualized plan of care development for the services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/01/24 at 3:18 pm., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #2 and 3 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/02/24 at 3:20 pm., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 16 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. On 05/03/24 at 10:36 am., Staff B stated the plans of care for Patients #18 and 19 failed to be individualized for services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness.
Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure required background checks were completed by the surveyed hospice for two (Staff H and K) of five employees. --- A review of the "Long-Term Care Security Act Title 63 of the Oklahoma Statutes" documented requirement for an OKSCREEN national background check with fingerprinting for all employees of a home care agency whose employment began after 07/01/14. Staff H A review of the personnel record showed a background check performed by another agency license number. No background check was performed for the surveyed agency through OKSCREEN for Staff H. Staff K A review of the personnel record showed a background check performed by another agency license number. No background check was performed for the surveyed agency through OKSCREEN for Staff K. On 05/02/24 at 1:30 pm, Staff L stated the OKSCREEN for Staff H and K were not completed by the surveyed hospice.
← Back to the Saint Francis Hospital, Inc record
Federal survey findings only. State licensure findings for hospices are not shown.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction