Upon patient record review, 13 of 13 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. The election statements did not include any physician for these patients.
Every finding on record at In Touch Hospice Care Inc.
Arcadia, California · CCN A11605
6 findings across 1 survey, in the inspector's own words.
The inspector’s own words from form CMS-2567, unedited, including CMS’s own spacing. Names and some dates are redacted by CMS.
Survey of October 26, 2023
6 findingsUpon personnel record review, 2 of 16 (Personnel #4 & 6) the RN and the aide did not have evidence that this direct core services were hospice personnel/employee, there was not an evidence of (W-2) form in their files. Corrected on site
Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #9) did not have evidence of a job description for this individual who supervises volunteers for his/her role. Corrected on site
Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel # 2) did not have evidence of a job description for the role as alternate administrator. Corrected on site
Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice designated a physician to serve as alternate Medical Director when the Medical Director is not available to assume the same responsibilities and obligations as the Medical Director. Corrected on site
Upon patient client record review, 13 of 13 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 &13) did not have evidence that the patient or representative identified or acknowledged the attending physician of his/her choice. The election statements did not include any physician for these patients.
← Back to the In Touch Hospice Care Inc. record
Federal survey findings only. State licensure findings for hospices are not shown.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction