Deficiency Index

Every finding on record at Phoebe Putney Memoriail Hospital, Inc.

Albany, Georgia · CCN 117100

8 findings across 2 surveys, in the inspector's own words.

The inspector’s own words from form CMS-2567, unedited, including CMS’s own spacing. Names and some dates are redacted by CMS.

Survey of May 1, 2024

5 findings
E0000

A recertification survey was conducted at Phoebe Home Health on April 29, 2024, and concluded on May 1, 2024. At the time of the survey, the agency was in compliance with 42 CFR Part 418.113, Emergency Preparedness and Covid-19 infection control.

G0000

A recertification survey was conducted at Phoebe Home Health on April 29, 2024, and concluded on May 1, 2024. At the time of the survey, the agency was not in compliance with Chapter 42 CFR Part 418, Rules and Requirements for Home Health and Hospice Agencies. The census was 202. The following deficiencies were cited.

G0372

Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview and Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) report, the agency failed to submit to CMS a completed Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) within 30 days of completing the assessments. Findings include: On 5/1/2024 at 10:45 a.m., an interview with the Administrator confirmed awareness of OASIS submission timeframe requirements. Review of CMS report titled “HHA Error Summary by Agency 117100”, revealed the following: GA117100, PHOEBE HOME HEALTH, Albany, Ga, -3330 (Error Number), Record Submitted Late: The submission date is more than 30 days after MOO90 on this new record.

G0574

Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient's mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient's risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This ELEMENT is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the agency failed to ensure that the plan of care included all required elements to address safety measures to protect against injury for two patients (P) (P#1 and P#11) of 17 sampled patients. Findings include: Review of the policy titled “Care Planning Process” review date 8/21/23 reveals the following: The plan of care will include (but not limited to): a. Identified patient/client problems and needs b. specific services by provided c. Reasonable, measurable and individualized goals d. actions to be taken to meet those goals e. type, frequency and duration of above actions f. equipment and supplies g. Prognosis h. Precautions, instructions, activities permitted, safety measures 1. P#1 was admitted to home health on 3/21/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis (a condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function) and requires dialysis treatment through arteriovenous (AV) access (a surgical procedure that creates a direct connection between an artery and a vein) three times a week. Review of the plan of care failed to reveal documentation of the presence of the AV shunt (hole or small passage that moves or allows movement of fluid from one part of the body to another) or interventions to protect the patient's AV shunt from harm, such as to avoid blood pressures or venipunctures in this extremity. 2. P#11 was admitted to home health on 4/9/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis (a condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function) and requires dialysis treatment through AV access three times a week. Review of the plan of care revealed documentation of the presence of a fistula (an artificial connection made between an artery and vein for dialysis access) however, the plan of care failed to specify the location of the fistula or interventions to protect the patient's fistula from harm, such as to avoidance of blood pressures or venipunctures in this extremity. The agency failed to ensure that the plan of care included safety precautions to protect safety of the patient and preserve the AV shunt. During an office interview on 4/30/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with the Clinical Informatics Educator, it was confirmed the agency staff failed to include safety precautions on the plan of care to ensure the safety of the patient's AV shunt.

G0584

Verbal orders CFR(s): 484.60(b)(3)(4) (3) Verbal orders must be accepted only by personnel authorized to do so by applicable state laws and regulations and by the HHA's internal policies. (4) When services are provided on the basis of a physician or allowed practitioner's verbal orders, a nurse acting in accordance with state licensure requirements, or other qualified practitioner responsible for furnishing or supervising the ordered services, in accordance with state law and the HHA's policies, must document the orders in the patient's clinical record, and sign, date, and time the orders. Verbal orders must be authenticated and dated by the physician or allowed pracitioner in accordance with applicable state laws and regulations, as well as the HHA's internal policies. This ELEMENT is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the agency staff failed to ensure verbal orders were signed and dated by the physician in accordance with the home health agency's policies for three of seventeen sampled patients (P) (P#2, P#4 and P#6). Findings were: Review of the agency policy titled, “Physician Orders/ Plan of care” review date 8/21/23 reveals the following: 4. All diagnostic and therapeutic orders, including verbal orders, will be signed by the physician, and incorporated into the clinical record within thirty days. 1. Review of the plan of care for P#2 with a recertification period of 3/9/24 - 5/7/24 revealed the plan of care failed to be approved and signed by the physician as of 4/30/24. The agency failed to ensure the plan of care which contains verbal orders was signed and dated by the physician within 30 days. 2. Review of the plan of care for P#4 with a recertification period of 2/10/24 - 4/9/24 revealed the plan of care failed to be approved and signed by the physician as of 4/30/24. The agency failed to ensure the plan of care which contains verbal orders was signed and dated by the physician within 30 days. 3. Review of the plan of care for P#6 with a recertification period of 2/18/24 - 4/17/24 revealed the plan of care failed to be approved and signed by the physician until 3/20/24. The agency failed to ensure the plan of care which contains verbal orders was signed and dated by the physician within 30 days. During an in-office interview on 4/30/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with the Clinical Informatics Educator, a request was made for the signed copy of the plan of care for P#2, P#4, and P#6. Clinical Informatics Educator revealed the plan of care had not yet been signed by the physician or within the 30-day timeframe.

Survey of April 28, 2021

3 findings
E0000

At the time of the survey Phoebe Home Health in Albany, Ga. was in compliance with 42 CFR Part 484.22 Emergency Preparedness for Home Health Agencies as a result of a standard recertification survey conducted on April 28, 2021. A Focus Infection Control Survey was completed at the time of the survey. No deficiencies were cited.

G0000

At the time of the Recertification survey, Phoebe Home Health, in Albany,Georgia was in substantial compliance with 42 CFR Part 484, Requirements for Home Health Agencies as a result of the survey conducted on April 28, 2021. Current census 941. Findings include:

G0574

Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient's mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient's risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This ELEMENT is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the patients' individualized plan of care/treatments included all of the required elements to address the identified needs for 3 of 17 (#2, #8 and #15). Findings were: 1. Review of the plan of care/treatment for Patient (P) #2 with a recertification period of 3/6/21 to 5/4/21 revealed the patient has a pertinent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2. The skilled nurse (SN) was required to provide instruction of diabetic home management to include: foot care, diet management and wound healing, diabetic diet, skin care and glucose monitoring however, the plan of care/treatment lacked blood glucose parameters to instruct the patient/caregiver on when to notify the skilled nurse or the physician of elevated blood glucose levels. The agency failed to ensure that the plan of care/treatment covered all pertinent interventions for the comprehensive care of the patient's diabetic status. During an interview on 4/27/21 at 9:15 a.m., the Registered Nurse (RN) AA confirmed the plan of care/treatment lacked a blood glucose parameters and stated staff are providing education during each visit to instruct the patient on how often to monitor blood glucose levels and when to notify the SN of high blood sugars. During an interview on 2/28/21 at 1:00 p.m. the Clinical Manager (CM) stated that the plan of care should contain blood glucose parameters and the SN should monitor the blood sugar readings at each visit. 2. Review of the plan of care/treatment for P#8 with a certification period of 4/13/21 to 6/11/21 revealed the patient has a pertinent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 and takes oral medications to control blood sugar. The skilled nurse (SN) was required to provide instruction of diabetic home management to include: foot care, wound healing and blood glucose monitoring however, the plan of care/treatment lacked orders for the frequency of blood glucose monitoring to instruct the patient/caregiver on how often to monitor blood glucose levels to identify early complications. The agency failed to ensure that the plan of care/treatment covered all pertinent interventions for the comprehensive care of the patient's diabetic status. During an interview on 4/28//21 at 1:00 p.m., the CM confirmed the plan of care/treatment lacked a blood glucose monitoring frequency and stated the clinicians are providing education during each visit to instruct the patient on how often to monitor blood glucose levels and are monitoring glucose levels while in the home. 3. Review of the plan of care/treatment for P#15 with a certification period of 12/04/2020 to 2/01/2021 revealed the patient has a pertinent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 and takes oral medications to control blood sugar. The skilled nurse (SN) was required to provide instruction of diabetic home management to include: diet, wound healing and blood glucose monitoring however, the plan of care/treatment lacked orders for the frequency of blood glucose monitoring to instruct the patient/caregiver on how often to monitor blood glucose levels to identify early complications. The agency failed to ensure that the plan of care/treatment covered all pertinent interventions for the comprehensive care of the patient's diabetic status. During an interview on 4/28//21 at 1:00 p.m., the CM confirmed the plan of care/treatment lacked a blood glucose monitoring frequency and stated the clinicians are providing education during each visit to instruct the patient on how often to monitor blood glucose levels and are monitoring glucose levels while in the home.

← Back to the Phoebe Putney Memoriail Hospital, Inc. record

Federal survey findings only. State licensure findings for home health agencies are not shown.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction