Yuba City Post Acute
Yuba City, California · CCN 055092
39 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 162
- Surveys
- 39
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 59
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Sutter
- Medicare-certified since
- 1968
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 1, 2026
222 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.22 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 28.6% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2251.2% | E2046.5% | F12.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Yuba City Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Oct 14, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the Administrator (Admin) failed to effectively ensure the facility met the needs of the residents when: 1. Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, committee identified and developed action plans to correct the deficient practices in the delivery of quality nursing care when Director of Nursing (DON) did not develop action plans, lesson plans and training in order to educate, evaluate and reevaluate the quality of the care and services that the nursing staff were providing to the residents (Residents 20, 29, and 99). 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Oct 14, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan (QAPI) committee identified and developed action plans to correct the deficient practices in the delivery of quality nursing care, prior to the survey findings. These failures resulted in a substandard quality of nursing care and actual harm to one resident (Resident 99). These failures had the potential to further affect the health, safety and well-being of all of the residents in the facility and leave them vulnerable to poor quality nursing care. Findings: On 10/14/2021 at 1:15 PM, a concurrent interview and review of the facility's QAPI binder was conduced with the Admin. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Nov 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 40 and Resident 4) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) B did not administer Resident 4's oral inhalation medication as ordered by prescriber.2. RN G administered Resident 44's medication not in accordance with the standards of practice.As a result, 2 errors were identified out of 26 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error was 7.69%.Findings:1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Nov 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly as specified by the manufacturers when the temperature of a medication refrigerator was out of range below the freezing point.This failure resulted in liquid medications to crystalize and become ineffective.Findings:During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, reviewed October 2024, the P&P indicated, drugs and biologicals are stored in a safe, secure orderly manner including drugs being stored in locked compartments under proper temperature and light. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision based on individual resident needs, for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 34, 50, and 28) when: 1. Facility staff was aware Resident 34 wandered (roamed from place to place) in and out of other resident rooms. 2. Facility staff was aware Resident 50 wandered in and out of other resident rooms. 3. Facility staff was aware that Resident 28 demonstrated daily episodes of increased agitation and volatility exhibited by yelling, cursing, and throwing items. This failure had the potential to impact resident safety, privacy, dignity, and placed residents at an increased risk for resident-to-resident altercations. Findings: 1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 162 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 13, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jan 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 30, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 14, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Apr 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 14, 2021Standard and complaint19 findings
Show the 31 earlier surveys
- Jul 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 26, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Dec 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 13, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Mar 29, 2019Standard12 findings
- Mar 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 2, 2018Standard6 findings
- Apr 27, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2017Standard7 findings
- Aug 29, 2016Complaint3 findings
- May 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 29, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 22, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Nov 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 13, 2014Standard and complaint27 findings · 5 harm
- Nov 7, 2013—7 findings
- Oct 30, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 7, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 9, 2012—8 findings
- Dec 16, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction