Deficiency Index

Yakima Valley School

Selah, Washington · CCN 50A261

45 surveys since 2010, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
104
Surveys
45
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file33/45

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Yakima
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 56 facilities of 100–127 beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

May 1, 2026

192 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day16.604.83
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.13—
Annual nurse turnover32.2%35.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K12.9%L—
Actual harmG38.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2367.6%E617.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.9%
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 104 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6452×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Yakima Valley School, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF609Sep 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 of 11 staff (Staff M, O, Q, D, F, J, and H) immediately (not later than two hours after the allegation was made) reported allegations of abuse to the facility administration and State Agency (SA) and to implement timely interentions to protect 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued abuse, potential for harm, and diminished quality of life and constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 20, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for dental sedation. The failure to follow post sedation safety protocol resulted in Resident 1 to have an unwitnessed fall that caused a 10-centimeter (cm) laceration mid forehead that required 11 staples at the hospital. Findings included.Record review of facility's policy titled, Level of Supervision (LOS) 1.08, dated 10/2024, showed that a LOS would be assigned to provide an appropriate degree of supervision for each resident. Direct care staff would check the LOS assigned in the resident's record daily. Definition for LOS 3 was supervision must be positioned in a manner to protect the resident from or deter danger. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care, the assessed level of supervision and assistance were consistently provided to prevent an avoidable accident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls with injury. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were left unsupervised, had an unwitnessed fall or contact with a firm surface and developed a hematoma (a localized collection of clotted blood that pools outside of the blood vessels, similar to a bruise) to the right eye. Findings included . Record review of facility's policy titled, Level of Supervision (LOS) 1.08, dated 10/2024, showed that a LOS would be assigned to provide an appropriate degree of supervision for each resident. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 2 of 2 cognitively impaired residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) reviewed for allegations of abuse. This failure resulted in physical harm when Resident 1 who had severe cognitive impairment, dependence on staff, and was unable to express discomfort, was kicked in the face. Resident 1 experienced psychosocial harm, applying the reasonable person concept when Resident 1 had a change in sleep behaviors and eating patterns and seemed more withdrawn. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services necessary to prevent an avoidable accident for one of one resident (#1) reviewed for [CONDITION(S)] when Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) placed a warm pack (a wash cloth heated with an unknown temperature of water) on the resident's abdomen for an unknown length of time to relieve [CONDITION(S)]. This failure caused harm to Resident #1 resulting in first and second degree [CONDITION(S)] to their abdomen and left inner thigh, requiring medical treatment. Findings included . […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 104 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 1, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Apr 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2025Standard8 findings
  • May 28, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 37 earlier surveys
  • Sep 3, 2024Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Apr 17, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2022Standard4 findings
  • May 17, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 10, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 13, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 20, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Nov 13, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 23, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2018Standard5 findings
  • May 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2018Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
  • May 12, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 4, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Sep 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2014—1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 15, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2012—2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2012—1 finding
  • May 3, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 9, 2011—2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction