Deficiency Index

Woodridge Nursing Home

Barre, Vermont · CCN 475045

32 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
96
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
153
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HEALTH NETWORK
County
Washington · rural
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 33 facilities in Vermont.

Last survey on record

Sep 23, 2025

412 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.944.38
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.25—
Annual nurse turnover62.6%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$21,453 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2165.6%E515.6%F26.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.1%C26.3%
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 96 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6073×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Woodridge Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 23, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident, as a result, 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) suffered physical harm. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1's diagnoses include frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. Per review of Minimum Date Set (MDS; a standardized tool used to evaluate residents' needs and improve care planning) dated 8/4/25, Resident #1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 11, suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. Per record review, Resident #2's diagnoses include unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive function and awareness, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and restlessness and agitation. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF658Jun 24, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice regarding wound care for 5 of 9 applicable residents (Residents #1, #2, #4, #5, and #7). The findings include the following: 1. Per record review for Resident #1, the resident was admitted to the facility with chronic leg ulcers. Per observation on 6/22/21 at approximately 10:30 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was to complete a dressing change to both legs. The LPN and the Registered Nurse (RN) nurse surveyor donned full PPE (gloves/gown/eye protection) and entered the resident's room. The resident's bed stored the necessary supplies required for the treatment. The room was observed as disorganized and cluttered with the breakfast tray present on the bedside table. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 24, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that necessary treatment and services are provided consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers, for 1 of 7 applicable residents sampled, (Resident #1). The findings include the following: Per review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 6/20/21 the facility received report from RN (Registered Nurse) from the Medical Center Emergency Department (ED), that Resident #1, also has an open area to right buttock near cleft center of right buttock measures 1 centimeter (cm) round, [MEDICATION(S)] dressing applied. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF925Jun 24, 2021

    Based on observation, administrative staff report reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensuring that the facility is pest free, as evidenced by dead flies in overhead light fixtures on all three units, the dining room, and the dietary department. The facility also failed to ensure that 1 resident (Resident #9), with diagnosed maggots in his/her wound could not infest other residents. A second resident (#1) was diagnosed with infected maggots in his/her wounds 20 days later. The findings include the following: Per facility tour on 6/22/21 beginning at approximately 8:15 AM the surveyor observed evidence of dead flies in the plastic coverings of several overhead light fixtures in the following locations. Spruce Common Unit: Rm. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF657Mar 23, 2021

    Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the Care Plan of one resident [Res.#1] of 4 sampled residents regarding prevention of falls and injury. Findings include: Res. #1 was initially admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A review of the facility's Fall Prevention Policy identifies the Prevention procedure as Residents will be individually evaluated for the potential risk of falling so that reasonable and appropriate measures can be developed to address each resident's individual needs in an effort to mitigate the identified risk areas. A review of Res. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 96 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 23, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 12, 2025Standard15 findings
  • Jul 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Mar 7, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2023Standard2 findings
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Mar 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Jul 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2021Complaint6 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 23, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 12, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2017Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 31, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Aug 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 29, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2012—4 findings
  • Aug 2, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 22, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction