Woodland Care Center
Reseda, California · CCN 056066
98 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 348
- Surveys
- 98
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 157
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- GENESIS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1980
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 16, 2026
116 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.83 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.30 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 20.9% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $30,972 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 2
- Special focus
- SFF Candidate
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J21.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D7255.8% | E4938.0% | F21.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B43.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6898×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8428×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F7556×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F8806×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6415×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Woodland Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806Apr 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 71) with known food allergies (a substance that causes an allergic reaction [a condition that causes illness when someone eats certain foods or touches or breathes in certain substances]), was not served food containing allergens, by: 1. Serving for breakfast, on 4/8/2025, cream of wheat (a type of hot cereal that contains gluten [a protein found in the wheat plant and some other grains]; wheat is commonly used in breads, baked goods, and pastas) to Resident 71, who was known to be allergic to gluten as indicated in Resident 71's Physician's Order, Care Plan (a form where you can summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments),… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806May 3, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 147) was not given food containing allergens (a substance that causes an allergic [a condition that causes illness when someone eats certain foods or touches or breathes in certain substances] reaction) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) did not inform a licensed nurse (a Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] or Registered Nurse [RN]) of Resident 147's request for a snack on 4/14/2024 which would then require a licensed nurse to complete a Diet Order and Communication Form (DOCF- a form designed to ensure clear communication between residents, nurses and dietary staff that indicates dietary preferences and restrictions to promote safe food distribution) prior to providing… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Jun 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse properly when the dumpster's (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away by special collection vehicle, or to a bin that specially designed garbage truck lifts) surrounding floors had trash and litter. This failure had potential to attract birds, flies, insects, pests (animal or microorganism that has a negative effect on humans) and possibly spread infection to 138 of 138 facility residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/2026 at 11:25 a.m., of the dumpster area with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed soiled gloves, napkins, and disposable spoons on the dumpster floor surroundings. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Water Management Program ([WMP] - a written, step-by-step plan for buildings to ensure their water system was safe, clean, and efficient) by failing to ensure the hot water tank was flushed monthly. This failure placed the residents, staff and visitors at risk for exposure to unsafe water conditions. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/4/2026 at 9:25 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the facility's Water Management Program (WMP) was reviewed. The MS stated that he and the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN) was responsible for the implementation of the facility's WMP. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jun 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of continuous glucose (sugar) monitoring (CGM-glucose monitor uses a sensor that is placed on the back of the upper arm and worn externally by the user, allowing glucose information to be monitored using a mobile application; the hand held reader is used to scan the glucose without the need to prick the fingers) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 145). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inaccurate blood sugar readings due to the lack of training provided to the licensed nurses on the functionality of the CGM device which could negatively affect management of Resident 145's diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar… […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 348 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2026Standard17 findings
- May 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 1, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 29, 2026Complaint2 findings
Show the 90 earlier surveys
- Jan 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 15, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Sep 8, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Aug 22, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Apr 11, 2025Standard and complaint27 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 3, 2024Standard and complaint21 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 12, 2023Complaint6 findings
- Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Jun 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Sep 13, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Sep 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 4, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2021Standard17 findings
- Oct 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 4, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Dec 2, 2020Complaint5 findings
- Dec 1, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Aug 31, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 4, 2019Standard and complaint16 findings
- Oct 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 26, 2019Complaint3 findings
- May 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2018Standard and complaint27 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 26, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Sep 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 9, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jun 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 12, 2016Standard21 findings · 4 harm
- Sep 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 4, 2015Standard19 findings
- Jul 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2014Standard8 findings
- Aug 14, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 19, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 6, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 28, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 25, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 11, 2013—14 findings
- Dec 20, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 5, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 28, 2011—14 findings
- Jun 15, 2010—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction