Deficiency Index

Woodard Creek Health & Rehabilitation

Olympia, Washington · CCN 505387

52 surveys since 2010, 15 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
242
Surveys
52
Harm or worse
15
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file39/52

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
152
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
County
Thurston
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

May 29, 2026

164 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.893.97
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover71.8%45.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$189,638 across 2 penalties
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L11.0%
Actual harmG22.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6260.8%E3736.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 102 of the 242 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6096×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6106×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Woodard Creek Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF610May 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, report and thoroughly investigate allegation of abuse/neglect for 5 of 8 sample residents (Resident 78, 37, 94, 100, & 131) reviewed for abuse and 20 supplemental residents (Resident 25, 53, 143, 4, 144, 150, 31, 45, 86, 80, 148, 149, 112, 99, 110, 69, 116, 10, 44, & 38) whose reported allegations of potential abuse and neglect were identified upon review of the facility's grievance log. The allegations identified included verbal abuse, rough handling, residents being fearful of staff, lack of incontinence care, not responding to call lights for multiple hours or turning call lights off and leaving without providing the requested care, and failure to provide help with bathing and hygiene for up to a week. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF561Aug 31, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to exercise their rights when the facility obtained consent from family members for the placement of wander-guard devices without establishing that the family members had legal authority to make decisions on behalf of 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 6) reviewed for resident rights. This failure caused actual psychosocial harm to Resident 1 by significantly compromising the resident's psychosocial well-being, as evidenced by persistent emotional distress, including crying; repeated statements of feeling imprisoned, trapped, and desperate; and expressions of suicidal ideation when the resident was prevented from attending church. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services were provided to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers (PU), and to promote wound healing and prevent further decline of existing PUs for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 11 and 14) reviewed for pressure injuries. Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident specific risk factors, develop and implement preventative measures, and timely identify, assess, monitor, treat, and notify the provider of newly developed PUs that direct care staff had knowledge of. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified wound development and/or deterioration, delayed treatment, and intervention. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 2, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who fell were assessed/evaluated for increased supervision and/or that a resident-specific fall prevention care plan was implemented for 1 of 3 residents (3) reviewed for falls. These failures put residents at risk for further injury, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Resident 3, who was assessed as a known high fall risk, was on blood thinning medication and had severe cognitive impairment, experienced harm when they had an unwitnessed and unsupervised fall, sustained a left hip fracture and experienced extreme pain as evidenced by the resident's grimacing and yelping when rolled to their left side.Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 29, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the resident's care plan when providing care by not having two staff present for bed mobility for one of four sampled residents (1) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. This caused harm to Resident 1 when she was rolled off the bed to the floor during care. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, muscle [CONDITION(S)], and contractures (permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, and skin). […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 242 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 31, 2026Complaint17 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2026Standard and complaint26 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 2, 2026Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 4, 2025Complaint6 findings
  • Jun 30, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 24, 2025Standard and complaint22 findings
Show the 44 earlier surveys
  • Feb 6, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • May 31, 2024Standard20 findings
  • May 24, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Apr 21, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2019Standard21 findings
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 10, 2018Standard17 findings
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Sep 6, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 25, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 2, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Oct 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 3, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 10, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Nov 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2014Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2013Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 4, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 24, 2012—4 findings
  • May 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2012—1 finding
  • May 23, 2011—1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2011—4 findings
  • Oct 1, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction