Willowbrooke Court at Country House
Wilmington, Delaware · CCN 085003
13 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 62
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 14
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES
- County
- New Castle
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 26, 2025
621 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.92 | 4.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.32 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E116.7% | F116.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Willowbrooke Court at Country House, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 9, 2024
Based on observation and interview during the initial kitchen tour, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: 2/5/24 from 8:22 AM to 8:35 AM, observation of the kitchen with E1 (NHA) revealed the following: - observed 1/4 tray of cake (vanilla with chocolate icing) and a full tray of sloppy joe were undated in the refrigerator; - observed a full tray of frozen dough that was not covered completely and undated, a plate with two pieces of cooked chicken was uncovered and undated and a clear bag of chicken nuggets was undated in the walk-in freezer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Feb 9, 2024
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R4) out of five residents reviewed for clinical records, the facility failed to ensure that R4's medical records were complete and readily accessible as evidenced by the failure to upload the attending physician notes in the EMR (electronic medical record). Findings include: 5/21/20 - R4 was admitted to the facility. 1/23/23 - R4 was seen by E6 (MD) for R4's required 60 day visit. 3/27/23 - R4 was seen by E6 for R4's required 60 day visit. 5/6/23 - R4 was seen by E6 for R4's required 60 day visit. 6/26/23 - R4 was seen by E6 for R4's required 60 day visit. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF623Feb 26, 2025
Based on clinical record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R3) out of one resident reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to send a copy of a hospital transfer notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings include: Review of R3's clinical record revealed: 1/10/25 - R3 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including the aftereffects from a fall, heart disease, chronic pain, diabetes and anemia. 1/15/25 - R3 experienced severe stomach pain with diarrhea, and the R3 was sent to the hospital for an evaluation, and was admitted to the hospital. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Feb 26, 2025
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that R1's physician order for weekly blood pressure (BP) monitoring on Mondays was completed. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 5/22/24 - R1 had a physician's order for blood pressure every week on Mondays for diagnosis of high blood pressure. According to the monthly electronic MARs, R1 was receiving the following medications for a diagnosis of high blood pressure from December 1, 2024 through February 18, 2025: - Cardizem daily; - Hydrochlorothiazide daily; and - Atenolol twice a day. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF712Feb 9, 2024
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R8) out of five residents reviewed for physician services, the facility failed to ensure the resident was seen for the required physician visits. Findings include: R8's clinicial record revealed: 12/5/23 - R8 was admitted to the facility. Review of R8's clinical record revealed the absence of an initial comprehensive visit by the Physician. 2/8/24 at 2:03 PM - During a combined interview, finding was confirmed with E1 (NHA) and E3 (Regional Clinical Director). 2/9/24 at 3:30 PM - Finding was reviewed at the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (Regional Clinical Director), E4 (RN Unit Manager) and E5 (ADON).
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 62 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 26, 2025Standard2 findings
- Feb 9, 2024Standard3 findings
- Apr 26, 2022Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jul 15, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2018Standard6 findings
- May 31, 2017Standard4 findings
- May 26, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Apr 2, 2015Standard7 findings
- May 21, 2014Standard5 findings
- Apr 26, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 22, 2011—7 findings
- Aug 11, 2010—5 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction